Mailwatch(ed) Forum

In another column she claims she always knew Gregg Wallace was a wrong'un.

A late edit from the original copy about wet woke women moaning about a bit of banter.

In whiny, poor-us, you-can't say-anything- these - days, right wing circles, it seems that Greg Wallace is fast becoming one of their culture war heroes:

'he's done nothing wrong, it's just a few soft, lefty, woke women who hate real men and it's the BBC's fault anyway, he's the real victim and everyone I know agrees'.

Rosvanian wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:20 pm In whiny, poor-us, you-can't say-anything- these - days, right wing circles, it seems that Greg Wallace is fast becoming one of their culture war heroes:

'he's done nothing wrong, it's just a few soft, lefty, woke women who hate real men and it's the BBC's fault anyway, he's the real victim and everyone I know agrees'.

That's tipping over into 'yet another perv that the BBC covered up.'

That must be a real headmelt for some of them......what is he "banter victim", or BBC pervert?

When was the last time he actually worked for the BBC?

Watchman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:34 pm That must be a real headmelt for some of them......what is he "banter victim", or BBC pervert?

The BBC bashers don't like it when you point out that most of Gregg Wallace's work was actually for small production companies rather than the BBC. In fact one of the companies he worked for was Shine which was formally owned by one of the Murdoch clan.

Watchman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:34 pm That must be a real headmelt for some of them......what is he "banter victim", or BBC pervert?

It wasn't kids or bumsex, therefore it was okay.

davidjay wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2024 1:04 pm

Watchman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:34 pm That must be a real headmelt for some of them......what is he "banter victim", or BBC pervert?

It wasn't kids or bumsex, therefore it was okay.

And yet I've seen him compared to Savile by the anti-BBC mob.

Oboogie wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 12:04 am

davidjay wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2024 1:04 pm

Watchman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:34 pm That must be a real headmelt for some of them......what is he "banter victim", or BBC pervert?

It wasn't kids or bumsex, therefore it was okay.

And yet I've seen him compared to Savile by the anti-BBC mob.

Consistency isn't their strongpoint.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... ictim.html

Hey Harry, you whinging get, you haven't been unjustly imprisoned for years so stop whining. You don't know what suffering is.

Meanwhile, you know who's really suffering? Nice Kate, that's who.

Also, here are some fat people I don't like. And some BBC people I think are getting paid too much. And finally.....oh, who cares?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... ed-me.html

In which Amanda decides to tell all about the men who have harassed and groped her over the years. Yes, she's a tough Aussie who put them all in their place (while wearing lovingly remembered high fashion outfits), but she's decided to care about all the stupid little girls who need to grow a backbone and stop whingeing - no, sorry, that was last month.

She also decided not to name any of the sex pest because she is saving that for her autobiography! In other words she will only name them for the right amount of money.

I did like this titbit.

Then, perhaps most surprisingly of all, when working in politics, I asked for a meeting with a Left-wing media executive to discuss the hostile coverage we felt we were receiving.

Does this mean that she only expected to be sexual harassed by right wing media executives and politicians?