:sunglasses: 37.8 % :pray: 2.7 % :laughing: 32.4 % 🧥 8.1 % :cry: 8.1 % :🤗 2.7 % :poo: 8.1 %
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#49561
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 10:06 pm Per the Guardian BTL, he's dropped that energy plan, funny old game.

Then again they can't tell the difference between tight spending on current spending and "to the right of Thatcher".
Ah the Guardian BTL or as I like to call it a gateway to hades.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#49605
Dead people are great in that regard, just like gods. They never clarify exactly what they meant, but they're so awesome and deserving of respect that you can't go against them.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#49624
Youngian wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 8:44 pm I’ve been hearing from the comrades there was no austerity under Atlee and he found loads of magic money to start the NHS and other nice tings. Big soft loan gifts from the US imperialists kept this country afloat and the post war years were still dire. The country was preparing for famine 1947.
Oh God, not that. Why do they think David Kynaston's book on that period is called "Austerity Britain"?

How do they explain the reaction to Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng if there's an easy magic money tree out there? Is the plan to for Jez, Richard Murphy, and Alan Woods to outwit the markets?
The Weeping Angel liked this
By mattomac
#49631
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 10:06 pm Per the Guardian BTL, he's dropped that energy plan, funny old game.

Then again they can't tell the difference between tight spending on current spending and "to the right of Thatcher".
Thankfully I can read so I don’t have to rely on that paper.
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Watchman
#49641
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 7:49 pm Dead people are great in that regard, just like gods. They never clarify exactly what they meant, but they're so awesome and deserving of respect that you can't go against them.
Bloody hell, We’ve not lost comrade Jez?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#49694
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 7:49 pm Dead people are great in that regard, just like gods. They never clarify exactly what they meant, but they're so awesome and deserving of respect that you can't go against them.
There ought to be a competition for this stuff.

Here's a good one. John Milton would have supported Brexit, or something.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... it-213984/
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#49696
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:08 pm
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 7:49 pm Dead people are great in that regard, just like gods. They never clarify exactly what they meant, but they're so awesome and deserving of respect that you can't go against them.
There ought to be a competition for this stuff.

Here's a good one. John Milton would have supported Brexit, or something.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... it-213984/
Paradise Lost...
By Youngian
#49699
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:08 pm
Andy McDandy wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 7:49 pm Dead people are great in that regard, just like gods. They never clarify exactly what they meant, but they're so awesome and deserving of respect that you can't go against them.
There ought to be a competition for this stuff.

Here's a good one. John Milton would have supported Brexit, or something.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... it-213984/
That was written by an American in a tweed suit who laughs loudly at Keeping up Appearances on PBS.
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#49730
Fucking hell, that's bad. Our Island Story meets the theme park version of WW2. Funnily enough, he doesn't ask why someone in Hawaii should give a fig for the governance of Nebraska. Also, his apology of sorts for Trump - he says some things with disturbing overtones, but that's OK because he's ignorant - is about as shit as they come.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#49788
I appreciate that BTL on the Guardian isn't the most impartial place, but I get the impression that Sir Keir isn't at his best on these radio phone ins. Why does he do them? Nobody from the Government does. Nick Clegg did but seemed like it was for something to do (he didn't have a department). The Leader of the Opposition has plenty to do. Sounds like the callers are a mix of unhappy Labour voters and UKIP. What's in it for Sir Keir?

Today he said that the scrappage with ULEZ needed to be more generous. Lots of people would agree with that. It's barely a story even on the Guardian, and I doubt any other outlet is going out of its way to inform its audience. Same with the u-turn on gender- this is likely to be reasonably popular overall. But same applies, except critical outlets will pick it up and magnify it. As I say, what's in it for him?
  • 1
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 144
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]