Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 9:19 pm
It's definitely got its roots in public schools, where no boy expected to actually work for a living, so science lessons were basically about blowing shit up and making smelly concoctions.
That, I think, is the key to a lot of this thinking. Jobs worthy of a gentleman, or ones to aspire to, were about communication: law, politics, church, management, journalism. So while if you work in a practical job you pretty much need some maths or applied science (e.g. mechanics), at a higher level it's enough to get others to make things work, rather than know how they work. Throw in a bit of aspirational snobbery too.
I recall an incident during the Cameron government.
Weekend at Chequers, a breaker tripped and nobody present knew what to do.
They faffed about trying to find a security cleared electrician to send, meaning David was Camera-off for something like four hours.
I was amazed that nobody (even the Met's protection personnel) knew how to reset an RCD breaker.
The journalists/announcers reporting the story weren't amazed through.
There was at least one "Fortunately we have our engineers here in the studio".
There wasn't a single one of the press corps enquiring about the PM's safety or national security.
Still: Latin and rowing, they're good, eh!