Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:45 pm
Oboogie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2025 5:55 pm
On the elite athletes as teachers thing: We're all familiar with the "Those who can, do, those who can't, teach" line. Now that's an anti-academic trope suggesting teachers are inferior to people with 'proper jobs'. But it does, inadvertently, make a valid point. Being able to impart knowledge, to teach or to train others requires a specific skillset. Being highly skilled at some task, trade or profession does not automatically mean you have the ability to effectively pass on those skills, equally a great football coach is probably not the most skilled player at the training session. Two different roles requiring different skills.
For example:
* Glen Hoddle - Great player, far less successful coach.
* Jurgen Klopp - Modest player, outstanding coach.
I was actually thinking of two former FE colleagues of mine:
1) An accountant who, aged about 55, sold his successful accountancy practice and retired. Then, out of a mixture of boredom and civic duty, decided to give something back by teaching accounts part-time. After 35 years as an accountant who knew his stuff backwards, he found he just couldn't cope with students who found the subject hard and needed repeated explanations of aspects of basic accountancy practice. He was sufficiently self-aware to realise that the failure was his and packed it in after a couple of years.
2) A 25 year old with a First in Law from Cambridge who had planned a stellar career at the Bar who drifted into teaching Law after he'd proved multiple times that he was shit in court. Specifically, not quick enough thinking on his feet under pressure, I believe, leading to panic and his mind going blank.
Turned out, in a classroom, he was brilliant. Students loved him, he got excellent results and sprinted up the promotion ladder faster than anyone I've ever seen. So he really was someone who taught because he couldn't , "do".