Still can't get over Amanda Abbington.
Although she does not name us, she posted our pictures beside a message saying: 'These three women are making it their life's work to destroy not only my 32 -year reputation but also my mental and emotional health and my daughter's mental and emotional health. They are the lowest of the low, dreadful, scheming, lying, bitchy bullies.
'I have no idea what I did to them to make them come after me with such venom, lies and anger but, my loves, you have rattled the wrong cage. You do not frighten me and you do not intimidate me. You're all on my list and like a f****** elephant, I never, ever forget, I rarely forgive and I am stubborn, methodical and petty as f***. I feel sorry for all three of you and it baffles me why you live your lives with such anger, bitterness and frustration in your hard little hearts.'
These are really egregious accusations and I'd say defamatory, although I'm no legal expert.
Going on to describe Abbington as "a clearly successful actress" (not so long ago she was mocking her for appearing in a play and getting less than full houses every night)...
Why rage against journalists covering a story you generated, Amanda?
Because maybe you didn't "cover the story" - you raged and snarked at her because she crossed a line you didn't like. Anyway, onto other things.
Boots is using gender-neutral pronouns in its new Christmas ad. Jolly good, but am wondering how we'd make classic carols inoffensive to snowflakes? Perhaps we could start by singing O Come Let Us Adore They/Them?
Gender neutral pronouns are not meant to be used for everyone; they offer an alternative for people who prefer not to be addressed as he or she. If you see yourself as a him or a her, trans people will be generally happy to oblige.
It’s hard for actors to escape being stereotyped as a handsome assassin after playing James Bond, yet clearly Daniel Craig has managed it by appearing in a crumpled pinstriped suit to promote his role as a gay guy in the movie Queer. Just hoping for the sake of his gorgeous wife Rachel Weisz he doesn’t turn up at home looking like this, as she might be shaken – but certainly not stirred.
1. It's called acting.
2. "role as a gay guy"?
Anyway, back to the bitching. Remember the "egregious accusations" of her being "the lowest of the low, dreadful, scheming, lying, bitchy"? Here's her on Oti Mabuse:
Respect for the adorable former Strictly star Oti Mabuse leaving her one-year-old daughter at home with her husband as she enters the I'm A Celeb jungle, insisting: 'Mum has goals as well.' And plaudits as the once body-perfect pro dancer embraces her new full-breasted mum figure in all its gloriousness.
Ha ha, you're a shit mum, you fat cunt.
Staggering that worklessness among the young has hit a ten-year high with 1.2 million of those aged 16 to 24 not studying full-time or even looking for a job, and many citing their mental health problems. I blame woke parents who indulge their diddums rather than sending them out to work
Without paid jobs, there's not much you can do. Plus, you know, a few bigger issues than just work. Anyway, onto football! That Alex Scott:
She became the first female football pundit on the BBC during the men’s World Cup in 2018 and she is a bonny lass.
Yet when commenting on the men’s game, I find her both plodding and, more importantly, uninformed. Which is what you would expect from someone who, despite triumphing in the women’s game, has never played at the far quicker and more skilful level of the men.
The men’s English top flight has been a powerhouse of world football for many years but the fact is that she has had no experience of it.
You've never been an MP, Amanda, nor have you ever acted or been on Strickly. Why the fuck are you talking about those things? Anyway, Archbishops:
All jolly good and progressive, but such speculation about who should become our first woman Archbishop fails to consider the complexities of the Worldwide Anglican Church, of which the Archbishop of Canterbury is the global head. Its followers encompass conservative traditionalists all over the world, not least in Sub-Saharan African countries from Kenya to Namibia.
Hey, wait a minute! Aren't you usually demanding we don't pander to those backward thugs with their outdated views that have no place in our....oh, wait. I forgot.
Even here in Britain, 600 parishes are still refusing to accept female vicars.
At my church, when consulted over choosing a new vicar, most of the largely small-c conservative congregation stipulated a High Church, traditional Anglican pastor, with ‘no happy clappy’ and certainly no women.
Yeah, it's different for cunts, isn't it?
For people like me, a woman reading the sermon and preaching the Gospel somehow still seems odd.
To my mind, a woman Archbishop would discomfit the Worldwide Anglican Congregation of churchgoers. That is more than 85 million people, of whom the UK constitutes around a measly 685,000.
There, I’ve said it and expect plenty of opprobrium for my views.
I’m not saying the Church of England or Match Of The Day – or, indeed, any other organisation – should not have a female figurehead. I’m simply arguing that the best, most qualified person should get the job, and that progressive values should not hold sway.
NO, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, YOU REACTIONARY TWAT!
