:laughing: 100 %
User avatar
By Killer Whale
#78219
Problem is that there's a myth on the left that you only need to take a billion or two off the likes of Bezos and everything will be sorted. The idea that we'd all have to pay, or at least those of us earning a little more than minimum wage, has been avoided for too long.
Dalem Lake, Oboogie, davidjay and 1 others liked this
By mattomac
#78220
If they had reversed the second NI cut then I’d have been ok, the issue was the first one, effectively it covered my rent increase and with other slight increases I would have been fucked if they had reversed both.

Seems they will reverse nether which helps, problem is I’m not on MW but it really goes very little.

Love that budget piece on the BBC site, it’s mostly people who don’t live in the real world.
By Philip Marlow
#78238
kreuzberger wrote: Mon Oct 28, 2024 8:19 pm Public transport is and will remain a class issue for a country that revels in it being just that.

That is a cancer, preying on the communities and destinations which depend upon it the most.
I live in London and I know people who take buses for certain journeys because it’s less expensive than the train. Hell I’ve done it myself towards the end of the month.

Meanwhile, a tale of taxation and status in two tweets…

I


II
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#78243
Apparently Laura K was grilling Bridget Phillipson over the weekend about the poor, hard pressed landlords. Comments said that you "scrimp and save" (as LK put it) when you're choosing between heating and eating. You don't do it in order to expand your property portfolio.

You get a good range of diverse voices in the media, except for working class ones. Unless there to be sneered at. Which includes phone ins.
Philip Marlow, mattomac liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#78651
Per Frances Ryan, the Government haven't committed to the Tory policy on disability benefit cuts. They've just committed to the same level of savings. Which isn't going to make disabled people feel any better, but there's at least the possibility of the cuts being deferred and or reduced. Nobody's going to worry too much if they don't happen.
By davidjay
#78659
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2024 6:13 pm ITV going with "Starmer ignored Alan Bates' letters".

"Ignore" apparently means "didn't reply as quickly as Bates wanted". This is shit and they're not generally one of the worst offenders.
I don't know anything about the story but I do hope Alan Bates isn't going to go down the Baroness Newlove road of demanding everything, now because being a victim puts him beyond criticism.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#78775
Not sure this is such a good idea.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ing-budget
Rachel Reeves has committed not to increase taxes at Labour’s next budget and said the government would need to “live within the means” of her spending plans if public services came under mounting pressure.

After announcing the biggest package of tax rises in three decades in last week’s budget, the chancellor dismissed suggestions that she would need to find additional money by the spring to repair battered public services.

Asked whether more funding would be required for “unprotected” government departments at next spring’s budget and spending review – including for local councils, courts and prisons – she insisted enough was now earmarked for the next five years.

“We’ve now set the envelope for spending for this parliament,” she told MPs on the Commons Treasury select committee.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#78777
I wouldn't take this too literally. The logic would be that they don't need to do any more budgets. I would take this as meaning that the main tax rises have been done. If for instance a gambling levy were introduced, is Kemi going to say "New tax! Can't have that!" I'd be very surprised. Could also be things like local councils and metro mayors getting more powers to raise taxes. I don't think Leftwing Andy Burnham (who I think has done well generally) froze his mayor's precept this year and I don't think he's done the workplace parking levy yet (Nottingham has). He and the rest of them can take a bit of the heat off Reeves in the future.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#78778
Keir Starmer’s sycophantic words of congratulation to Donald Trump are among the most dispiriting things I have read this morning. “Shoulder to shoulder in defence of our shared values of freedom, democracy and enterprise”? This is either serious delusion or utter hypocrisy. He should be ashamed.
Karen Lewton
Newcastle upon Tyne
From The Guardian. A third possibility might be that Starmer doesn't want Trump to shit all over NATO. Karen's feelings can take one for the team (Ukrainian) team.
Oboogie liked this
By davidjay
#78786
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:20 pm
Keir Starmer’s sycophantic words of congratulation to Donald Trump are among the most dispiriting things I have read this morning. “Shoulder to shoulder in defence of our shared values of freedom, democracy and enterprise”? This is either serious delusion or utter hypocrisy. He should be ashamed.
Karen Lewton
Newcastle upon Tyne
From The Guardian. A third possibility might be that Starmer doesn't want Trump to shit all over NATO. Karen's feelings can take one for the team (Ukrainian) team.
And still they fail to realise that in politics you have to smile at people you hate. I don't suppose Ian Paisley and Gerry Adams were best mates, but them shaking hands ultimately saved lives.
Oboogie liked this
  • 1
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 40
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]