:sunglasses: 100 %
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#75160
Talking of conspiracies it seems according to the Algerian Olympic Commitee it's the fault of those Jews, I mean Zionists.

https://www.thejc.com/news/world/algeri ... w-oib9f6hn
Speaking before the bout, which guaranteed that she would win at least a bronze medal, Yassine Arab, the director of the Algerian Olympic and Sports Committees, told the Syndney Morning Herald Khelif had been attacked by shadowy forces.

“The Zionist lobby, they want to break the mind of Imane. But now Imane is very strong. They don’t want that a Muslim girl or Arabic girl goes higher in the level of the rank of female boxing,” he said.

“We are all here for Imane. You can see all the support of everybody from the world. All the international press associations, they support Imane.”
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#75161
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2024 11:28 pm Yes that appeal the appeal that isn't with the IBA as you seemed to think.
Ah, you got me! Or at least you would have, if I hadn’t known full well it wasn’t with the IBA. You’ll have to forgive me on that bit of misdirection, but I had my reasons.

Khelif appealing but having to withdraw for financial reasons was mentioned in that Atlantic article you like so much. But when you brought to up you just said she “chose not to appeal”. Interesting choice of words - firstly that makes it sound like she didn’t bother at all when - assuming you read your own reference - you knew she did, and secondly like it was a choice to avoid scrutiny, even though again, if you’d read the reference you supplied, you knew the reason was financial.

So I was interested to see if you’d correct me. Which you didn’t do. You just said who she would have appealed to. You didn’t mention that she actually *did*, or why she didn’t go through with it. So either you didn’t know and didn’t read your own stuff, or you did know and you misrepresented it. Neither of which cover you in glory.

Anyway, good luck with that. I was fed up enough of discussing things round in circles and regret being drawn back in, but this is more than reason enough to call it a day.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#75162
I did know that actually. I'll quote what you wrote
Yes, because famously when corrupt organisations arbitrarily disqualify you mid-contest for reasons they are neither clear nor consistent about but are highly likely to be politically motivated in favour of a dictator who likes arranging for officials he doesn’t like to fall out of the window, they’re bound to give you a wholly fair hearing.
You clearly seemed to be stating that she was appealing to the IBA not the court, so perhaps you could acknowledge that and stop being a smug git.
So I was interested to see if you’d correct me. Which you didn’t do. You just said who she would have appealed to. You didn’t mention that she actually *did*, or why she didn’t go through with it. So either you didn’t know and didn’t read your own stuff, or you did know and you misrepresented it. Neither of which cover you in glory.
I was correcting you because again you implied it she had to appeal to the IBA. Also stop being a smug git.
Anyway, good luck with that. I was fed up enough of discussing things round in circles and regret being drawn back in, but this is more than reason enough to call it a day.
Fine by me it's means I don't have to waste my time arguing with a smug git.

Also
I didn't know I was taking part in a test would have been nice to have told me also
You didn’t mention that she actually *did*, or why she didn’t go through with it. So either you didn’t know and didn’t read your own stuff, or you did know and you misrepresented it. Neither of which cover you in glory.
. I phrased it poorly ok I'm sorry I'm not as perfect as you.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#75185
@The Weeping Angel

Yeah, actually sorry about all that. I’ve not been in a good mood all last week for some reason but it’s no excuse for being a twat and doing the exact sort of overheating of a topic that just entrenches people further to one side or another and stops anyone listening. So, apologies.

The only thing more I’m going to say is, when you said you phrased something poorly, bear in mind the person who you assumed was being full-on TRA on Twitter might also have phrased something poorly. A bit more benefit of the doubt all round can only be a good thing.
Oboogie, The Weeping Angel, Arrowhead and 1 others liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#75193
RS2_3154.jpeg
RS2_3154.jpeg (124.47 KiB) Viewed 3039 times
Spoonman liked this
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#75203
Crabcakes wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:35 am @The Weeping Angel

Yeah, actually sorry about all that. I’ve not been in a good mood all last week for some reason but it’s no excuse for being a twat and doing the exact sort of overheating of a topic that just entrenches people further to one side or another and stops anyone listening. So, apologies.

The only thing more I’m going to say is, when you said you phrased something poorly, bear in mind the person who you assumed was being full-on TRA on Twitter might also have phrased something poorly. A bit more benefit of the doubt all round can only be a good thing.
Appreciated, look things got heated between us and we should draw a line under all this. I've been a bit of a sod over this myself.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#75206
RS2_2935.jpeg
RS2_2935.jpeg (384.47 KiB) Viewed 2985 times
It'll be a chilli recipe next.
By Oboogie
#75241
Yug wrote: Wed Aug 28, 2024 4:40 pm He was found at Paddington Station with a suitcase full of marmalade sandwiches and a note pinned to his duffel coat which said "Please look after tbis history teacher".
It's Malcolm, he likes his marmalade sandwiches made with sausages.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#75360
It is indeed.
Samanfur liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#75376
Crabcakes wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2024 9:35 am @The Weeping Angel

Yeah, actually sorry about all that. I’ve not been in a good mood all last week for some reason but it’s no excuse for being a twat and doing the exact sort of overheating of a topic that just entrenches people further to one side or another and stops anyone listening. So, apologies.

The only thing more I’m going to say is, when you said you phrased something poorly, bear in mind the person who you assumed was being full-on TRA on Twitter might also have phrased something poorly. A bit more benefit of the doubt all round can only be a good thing.
Good man.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#75974
If you were to suggest that Mia Farrow or Faye Dunaway, or Diane Keaton or Sylvester Stallone owed undying loyalty to Roman Polanski or to Woody Allen because their first big roles were in films by them; you'd be laughed out of town.

"Ah but they were happy to take the money!"

1. It wasn't her money.
2. She wasn't widely known to be a twat at that time.
Philip Marlow, Samanfur liked this
  • 1
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]