- Tue Jul 30, 2024 6:45 pm
#73929
I’m experiencing the same feelings as the awful news comes in from Southport as I did on that awful March 1996 morning, when the equally dreadful news was coming in from Dunblane Primary School : vicarious, tear-sodden grief -waves of it - mingled with anger, despair, and bewilderment : Just what kind of despicable maniac sets out deliberately to murder lots of innocent little kids ?
One thing that does puzzle me slightly is the frequently reported fact that the police “are not treating the attack as terrorist-related”. Objectively, what could be more “terrorist-related” than a murderous attack on a little kids’ dance class ? I can just about imagine how terrified those poor kids must have been when the attack began. To say nothing of the terror inflicted on the local Southport community.
I’m surmising that for something like this to qualify as “terrorist-related”, there needs to be an identified political motivation behind the actions taken. Am I right? The bloke that took a pot shot at Trump was also not, if I recall, being treated as “terrorist-related”, either, though there is surely some suspicion that his attack may have been at least partly politically motivated.
We do not, as yet, understand the motivation that drove the Southport attacker, but I do wonder how and why police are so quick, and so certain, to rule it out. Maybe I’ve misunderstood what the criteria are.
One thing that does puzzle me slightly is the frequently reported fact that the police “are not treating the attack as terrorist-related”. Objectively, what could be more “terrorist-related” than a murderous attack on a little kids’ dance class ? I can just about imagine how terrified those poor kids must have been when the attack began. To say nothing of the terror inflicted on the local Southport community.
I’m surmising that for something like this to qualify as “terrorist-related”, there needs to be an identified political motivation behind the actions taken. Am I right? The bloke that took a pot shot at Trump was also not, if I recall, being treated as “terrorist-related”, either, though there is surely some suspicion that his attack may have been at least partly politically motivated.
We do not, as yet, understand the motivation that drove the Southport attacker, but I do wonder how and why police are so quick, and so certain, to rule it out. Maybe I’ve misunderstood what the criteria are.
"The opportunity to serve our country: that is all we ask.” John Smith, May 11, 1994.