>sighs<
Charles Clarke - education secretary from 2002-2004, did nothing*, understood less (I worked for him) - has headed a review of Key Stage 3 by OCR (Oxford and Cambridge and RSA exam board).
It contains the following nuggets of insight and educational expertise:
The balance of exams and assessment at secondary school is “completely wrong” and the curriculum is “too backward-looking”
Speaking at a Westminster Education Forum event today, Mr Clarke also said that the secondary school curriculum needed to be more forward-looking and contemporary in order to engage students.
the key stage 3 years, for students aged 11 to 14, should be “focused more rigorously on building the foundational skills, particularly in maths and English”. This would help students to move forward successfully to future study at KS4
”We feel the curriculum itself has been too backward-looking and it needs to be more forward-looking, first and foremost, to engage the interests of students themselves.”
He suggested that a more forward-looking curriculum would include more content on areas such as digital skills, climate change and sustainability. (spoiler - it already does...)
He said the review has concluded that maths should be described instead as “mathematical and data education”, to better incorporate foundational mathematical skills.
Mr Clarke added that English could similarly be defined more widely to include a “range of language and presentational skills”, and this approach could then be extended out to the humanities and sciences.
In other words a smorgasbord of educational clichés and no genuine proposals on how such skills might be taught and the implications for the national curriculum. More of the same from Clarkey, I'm afraid.
*That's not entirely true. He did manage to overturn the DfES policy on healthy eating and had fried bread reinstated to the Sanctuary Buildings canteen breakfast menu.