Abernathy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 1:12 am
It’s all a witch hunt, a political stitch-up, a blatant attempt to have Julian Assange/Donald Trump/Russell Brand “cancelled” and silenced because they are telling the truth.
Are we seeing a theme, here?
It's also so utterly predictable that the same professional slabbers will also be the ones to take aim at the likes of Starmer et al about not prosecuting Savile whilst he was still alive either without a hint of irony, or even blatently revelling in their obvious contradictions. In their squeals that this "should only be taken to court" they are not interested in justice being fairly applied under the rule of law - they want it to smear those that accuse PULs like Brand knowing how difficult it is to get a successful prosecution for rape or other sexual assault so hey could then shout "Brand is innocent! He didn't do it!" not realising that's not how it works, while at the same time damming the same system
persecuting Assange, whom if eventually convicted will be a miscarriage of justice (or even the same concerning Brand if he eventually got it coming to him).
I'm not gonna lie, the legal system itself is not infallible and it is pretty much impossible to ensure that it can't fail at all, but those defending Brand aren't interested in such nuances in the wider picture - to them, it's just another game to play out in public the same way Fa**ge done concerning his 0.1%er bank account, and to hell with the collateral damage inflicted to others they they regard lower that what they wipe off the sole of their shoes in their wake. The old Christopher Hitchens quote concerning fecal matter, enemas & match boxes spring to mind concerning them, as well as a significantly large part still of the UK (and likely the USA) entertainment/media industry as a whole.