:sunglasses: 14.3 % :pray: 28.6 % :laughing: 42.9 % :cry: 14.3 %
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#51843
That 100+ schools in England are perilously close to collapsing must come as no surprise to government.

A fiver says that a senior civil servant has wafted back in to the DfE from Umbria and knocked a few heads together. Schools don't simply crumble "around their ears".

They kill children and no one wants that to happen, and certainly not this late in the electoral cycle.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#51847
Under Labour we had a large programme of rebuilding and improving schools.

Gove cancelled it in 2010, as soon as he and Cummings got their sweaty paws on education.

This was known about back then...

(Apparently the rush is due to a large concrete beam becoming detached and falling last weekend. Probably a sports hall, where this stuff is commonly used - think the roof of the Pantheon - for lightness.)
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#51850
A few people are trying to pin this on PFI, because of course every problem comes back to your favourite talking point. PFI was rightly (belatedly) scrapped because it was an expensive way of paying for work, but the school buildings were worthwhile and sometimes excellent.

My undersanding is that these are old buildings that have been overlooked because of government cuts from 2010. I recall Private Eye praising Gove for scrapping Building Schools for the Future because they didn't like the funding. It seemed pretty clear to me that it wasn't just the funding mechanism that was being cancelled, and here we are.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#51851
I said on the other thread that GIllian Keegan would be U-turning on having to provide a list. Apparently she's doing that now.

In the meantime, the Indpendent has identified some of the schools in question. Keegan must have realised that about 10 days of irate heads/ parents/teachers phoning up journalists with new schools wouldn't have been good news management.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 03116.html
By Oboogie
#51856
I'm sure the Tories and The Daily Mail will attempt to blame woke, lazy teachers for closing schools because six weeks holiday isn't enough for them.
This is an open goal for Bridget Phillipson, she needs to be all over the media stressing the message that "The Tories have put your child's life at risk for no reason".
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#51857
She's doing that.

The Mail isn't going to be able to blame woke teachers for this. Not even their most mad readers think that teachers build schools and inspect them. The best the Mail can do with this is something like "Remember when we had good workmen? Now we don't because too many are doing gender studies". That's not particularly strong.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#51865
Looking at some of the first schools named - Leicester, Bradford, Brixton - one does have to wonder if "fuck it, who cares?" figured into their decision making.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#51889
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:05 pm Looking at some of the first schools named - Leicester, Bradford, Brixton - one does have to wonder if "fuck it, who cares?" figured into their decision making.
I am old enough to remember when such a thought would have garnered a slap for being melodramatic and downright silly.

How times have changed.

This should be another strand of thorough investigation for a Truth & Reconciliation Inquiry if and when these homicidal thieves have been driven out of office.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#51924
Nick Gibb MP- we only just found out about this.
London Tory Councillor- it was known about in 1996, and Labour should have fixed it.

Think it's a brave line to argue that Labour wasn't focussed on improving school buildings, to be honest. And anyway, say they did know all about it in 1996. given that the shit hit the fan 13 years after leaving office, hard to say that they mucked up by prioritising other things, isn't it?

User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#51935
I was involved in formulating and submitting our schools bid for money to refurbish the building. That was in 2008 and I'm pretty sure we knew about it (but didn't have any - what we had was asbestos...)

Plans stalled by a Tory council and nixed by a Tory Education Secretary...
By mattomac
#51976
Phillipson has raised it several times.

The Tories are playing a losing card if they try and blame it on Labour. It just plays into the idea that nothing works in this country.

We can just be thankful that beam didn’t decide to come down a week later. Some suggesting it might be due to the wet weather.
By satnav
#51978
Whilst a lot of attention has been given to the dangers posed by this dodgy concrete the use of 'temporary classrooms' is equally worrying. We have 6 'temporary classrooms' at our school, they were erected in 1990 when the school merged with another school, yet 33 years later they are still in use. These classrooms are about two thirds of the size of normal classrooms, they have low ceilings and very little insulation. This means they get really hot in the Summer and very cold in the Winter. They are not very conducive to good teaching and the Maths department that is based in the classroom has seen a very high turnover of staff with at least 3 staff leaving each year.

The fact that so few new schools have been built in the last 13 years would suggests that there are probably now lots of temporary classrooms being used up and down the country.
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#51984
Well honed government machine in action.

I assumed that people were joking about schools having to analyse concrete themselves, but it seems to be exactly that. If I was responsible for this in a school, I think my attitude would be "Have we got some fairly old concrete? Yep. I'll have to report that to be on the safe side".

Oboogie liked this
By soulboy
#51986
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Fri Sep 01, 2023 4:20 pm
The Mail isn't going to be able to blame woke teachers for this. Not even their most mad readers think that teachers build schools and inspect them.
You'd be surprised (well, you wouldn't be really). I read a suggestion earlier that for 65 grand a year a train driver should be getting off his arse and fixing a signalling problem.
Tubby Isaacs, Oboogie liked this
  • 1
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 19
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]