:sunglasses: 32 % :pray: 16 % :laughing: 36 % :cry: 12 % :🤗 4 %
By Bones McCoy
#49571
Boiler wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:09 pm Somebody made a point about "low value degrees" elsewhere: what "value" did Cameron's, Truss's and Sunak's PPE degrees bring to the table?
Their measure is your salary post graduation.

Consider how Cameron's royal relative nepoting him a 90K job with a media firm immediately boosts the "value" of PPE.
It's a prime example of the absurdity of their measure.


I'd add a personal anecdote.
During 35 years working, almost 30 of those were spent on jobs which didn't exist when I applied for my degree.
The "value" measure threatens to shut down any attempt at future-proofing our youth's skills.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#49572
And as the Robert Halfon interview on GMB showed, they can't even decide if "social value" is a thing, or how to measure it. While the right will argue that nurses don't need degrees (just a Matron to obey and a junior doctor to shag some knowledge into them), even they will agree that a medical degree for a doctor is a good thing. But given how low starting salaries for many professionals are - they don't all start as top consultants or KCs* - such degrees wouldn't qualify a bright working class kid, while a rich kid with a 3rd in media studies and a parent with a production company flies through.

So, unless exceptions are made for, say, medicine, it won't work. Everyone will be claiming that their course is an exception to the rules.

They may as well admit it's about keeping the oiks out.

*An undergrad degree plus at least 3 years legal study and on the job training. And then you're still at entry level.
User avatar
By Watchman
#49704
The actual Prime Minister

Sunak’s tweet associating Labour with ‘criminal gangs’ labelled ‘desperate and pathetic’ by shadow cabinet minister – as it happened
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/li ... SApp_Other
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#49714
Umm.... he hasn't used it.
The reel indicates that the thread can be 'unrolled'.
User avatar
By Yug
#49724
Youngian wrote: Tue Jul 25, 2023 6:06 pm Nice guy Rishi still has currency so weak and unfit to lead would sound better than nasty bastard.
This is a bit rich, coming from the leader of the Party of choice for spivs, racists, tax-dodgers, and sex-pests.
Spoonman liked this
User avatar
By Watchman
#49729
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Tue Jul 25, 2023 6:52 pm Umm.... he hasn't used it.
The reel indicates that the thread can be 'unrolled'.
Found it! Not being a Twatter/X user, I was wondering why we were having government via cryptic crossword clues
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#49732
Yug wrote: Wed Jul 26, 2023 7:11 am
This is a bit rich, coming from the leader of the Party of choice for spivs, racists, tax-dodgers, and sex-pests.
Aaaaaah, but that's vicious abuse and the politics of envy. Not like our rough and tumble badinage.
User avatar
By kreuzberger
#49772
I seem to be back in the saddle today, albeit still a little groggy after a cracking day on the opiates on Monday.

Helping to clear the fog is the reaction to Sunak's notable Tweet. For fuck's fucking sake; this is the man who appointed Suella Braveman and Lee Anderson. That this foul behaviour should surprise anyone suggests that the weapons-grade pharmas have not been restricted to me.
Oboogie, Spoonman liked this
  • 1
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 148
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]