:pray: 25 % :laughing: 50 % 🧥 25 %
User avatar
By Samanfur
#4807
Youngian wrote: Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:40 pm New leader every month like UKIP? And then implode.
UKIP is trending on Twitter, purely on the strength of this.
kreuzberger, Tubby Isaacs, Spoonman and 3 others liked this
User avatar
By Spoonman
#5446
Brexit: NI Protocol is lawful, High Court rules

The Northern Ireland Protocol is lawful, a High Court judge in Belfast has ruled.

A group of unionist politicians, including Arlene Foster and Lord Trimble, had challenged the protocol in judicial review proceedings.

They claimed it was unlawful because it conflicts with the 1998 Good Friday Agreement and the Acts of Union.

But Mr Justice Colton rejected their challenge on all grounds on Wednesday afternoon.

Mr Colton found that the Withdrawal Agreement Act, which includes the protocol, does conflict with the 1800 Acts of Union in respect of free trade between Britain and Northern Ireland.

However, he added that the relevant parts of the Acts of Union are "impliedly repealed" by the Withdrawal Agreement Act.

That means that the more recent legislation automatically overrides the older laws.

He said the Acts of Union could not be used to override the "clear specific will of Parliament".

Normally, a constitutional law, like the Acts of Union, can only be expressly repealed, but they can be impliedly by another constitutional law.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-57666255

So to summarise...

"We want to withdraw from the EU so we can once again have a British Parliament making British laws for British people!"
"Okay then..."
"NO! Not like that!"
By Youngian
#5459
Andy McDandy wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:00 pm New laws trump old laws was pretty much day one of English law 101 at university.
Constitutional specialists Habib and Hoey knew better. They will leave court still convinced they’re right and invent a conspiracy about liberal elite judges to explain the verdict. Trimble is the Andrew Neil of Unionist politics. Garnered some respect late in his career only to piss it all away on Brexit.
User avatar
By Spoonman
#5463
The thing is that even if Justice Colton deemed that the NI Protocol was unlawful against the Act of Union 1800, all that the government in Westminster would be required to do would be to draft up legislation to be brought to Parliament to ensure either that the NIP was compatible with the 1800 AoU, or just repeal/amend the relative bits of the Act of Union that are in conflict, as it had been done several times in the 20th century - unless we're starting to see the rise of a loony fringe that hold the 1800 Act of Union the same way Freeman loons hold the Magna Carta (and somehow deeming that the Republic of Ireland is still part of the UK).
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#5478
She'd have to understand what she was seeing.

Feckin' PE teacher.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 7
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]