:sunglasses: 40.6 % :pray: 8.5 % :laughing: 30.2 % 🧥 4.7 % :cry: 12.3 % :🤗 3.8 %
#46422
The funniest part is he told his supporters not to go against it in the hope of avoiding a division so he could perpetuate the (to be honest already fairly busted) myth that he still had a lot of support. But because he installed such weak-minded nutters they had to ‘back boris’ even when Boris said not to. And so we see that he has about as much support as cast iron knickers with wet tissue paper for elastic.
User avatar
By Yug
#46428
In a way, I have some regard for the Magnificent Seven, who at least had the bottle to stand up and show the world that they are actually as insane as we thought they are. I have nothing but contempt for the spineless pissweasels, both pro and anti Johnson, who hid in the fridge rather than do what they believed to be right.

Corbyn included.
mattomac, Oboogie liked this
#46439
Dalem Lake wrote: Tue Jun 20, 2023 7:15 am My MP Peter Bone, a guy you could not keep off the airwaves to defend Johnson and even got a government non-job off him...abstained.
Jake Berry's mine. Married to Johnson’s former office manager, and has spent the last three and a half years bragging about how he's bezzie mates with Johnson, and can get your concerns straight into Johnson’s ear.

He made all of the right noises in the Commons, then abstained.
#46443
Hard not to see the abstentions as part of the overarching strategy, imported from the US, of delegitimising the results of the democratic process when they don't suit.

I think, based on the American precedent (and the lesser versions seen elsewhere, such as current Unionist/DUP posture that they aren't *really* a minority, because reasons) that we can expect to see more of this shit as the general election approaches and passes. I don't see it gaining the same traction in the UK, but it says a lot that they're going to try it anyway
#46446
Yeah, move the goalposts as to how you define who you answer to. Parliament? No. The party? No. Your constituents? Nope, not them. Who, then? The real people out there, the silent majority, those outside the elitist urban intellectual clever clogs book reading BBC4 watching more than two shirts in the wardrobe and know what quinoa is and how to pronounce it urban elites.
Dalem Lake liked this
#46447
I may have been overly quick to assign this to the US, given "16.7 million willofthepeople" has been the standard brickbat in British politics this last seven years.
Andy McDandy liked this
#46453
MisterMuncher wrote: Tue Jun 20, 2023 9:44 am Hard not to see the abstentions as part of the overarching strategy, imported from the US, of delegitimising the results of the democratic process when they don't suit.

I think, based on the American precedent (and the lesser versions seen elsewhere, such as current Unionist/DUP posture that they aren't *really* a minority, because reasons) that we can expect to see more of this shit as the general election approaches and passes. I don't see it gaining the same traction in the UK, but it says a lot that they're going to try it anyway
Silent Majority - is what they'll claim.
#46473
Bones McCoy wrote: Tue Jun 20, 2023 11:19 am
Silent Majority - is what they'll claim.
Problem (for them) is, silent majority only really works if everyone is silent. With over 100 against and 7 for, it just looks like they couldn’t be arsed and/or were just too cowardly.

Which is another Boris habit - not making difficult or principled decisions* if you can simply dodge them. See: every fucking Covid crunch point where he left it too late until only 1 choice remained that he could then claim was ‘following science’.

I was thinking about this the other night though: in a parallel universe, where Johnson submitted the Remain column, he probably would still have become PM at some point - possibly post Covid if Cameron made a hash of it - but in the EU. So he’d be able to have chosen a cabinet of intelligent, reasonable types such as David Gauke or Dominic Grieve, rather than being left with leave-leaning imbeciles, sycophantic dregs and sociopaths. He could have basically left the heavy lifting to them and genuinely been Funtime Boris the jolly leader. But he fucked it all because his greed for the job he felt he should have and jealousy toward Cameron wouldn’t let him play the medium game, let alone a long one.

If Dorries and his other hangers-on want to know who really did for Boris Johnson in 2023, they need look no further than Boris Johnson of 2016.

*the latter because this makes it more awkward should the opposite stance to the one you chose become more beneficial to you later.
By Oboogie
#46487
Yug wrote: Tue Jun 20, 2023 6:59 am In a way, I have some regard for the Magnificent Seven, who at least had the bottle to stand up and show the world that they are actually as insane as we thought they are. I have nothing but contempt for the spineless pissweasels, both pro and anti Johnson, who hid in the fridge rather than do what they believed to be right.

Corbyn included.
It's their job.
Turn up and vote on stuff in the interests of their country and their constituents.
That's what they are employed to do.
How many of us can take a day off just because there's a task to be done which we just don't fancy? How tolerant of that behaviour would our employers be?
Ironically, I understand from Newsnight that many of them opted to attend a party instead.
Abernathy, Yug liked this
#46527
Abernathy wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2023 12:04 am This is hilarious, and more than slightly tragic.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/i ... 33ccb&ei=6
You could cut that down to "I am a libertarian".
The rest is straight out of the dog-eared playbook.

While I accept that everybody needs a hobby, this week has seen far too much "ramming it down unwilling throats".
User avatar
By Yug
#46532
Please, oh please. Do it

The Liberal Democrats have written to the government's Forfeiture Committee seeking to have Boris Johnson's honours list withdrawn.

Christine Jardine, the party's spokesperson for the cabinet office, raised doubts about the suitability of the people the former prime minister nominated for titles, including those "implicated in the partygate saga".

The MP for Edinburgh West also said the events that have occurred since their names were released two weeks ago have "brought the honours system into disrepute" and there are grounds for revoking the list "in its entirety"...

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/lib-dems ... t-12906422
Anybody recommend by Johnson should be automatically barred on the grounds of "if that twat wants to reward them for something then they're probably dodgy as fuck ."
User avatar
By Watchman
#46538
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:12 pm You'll be amazed to hear this. Bozo has taken an IDS approach to the CVs of people he's honoured.

Is this the photograph the Met said was insufficient evidence of any rule breaking?
  • 1
  • 252
  • 253
  • 254
  • 255
  • 256
  • 276
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]