:sunglasses: 57.1 % :pray: 4.8 % :laughing: 28.6 % :poo: 9.5 %
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#44886
And remember, if UB40 and their recommendation were repeated across the country, Jezza would have taken Downing Street by storm with a bigger landslide than Attlee.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#45379
If by a failure of diplomacy they mean Truss appearing clueless about which places were actually in Russia or Ukraine, perhaps. But it's a fucking awful cliché. It wasn't a failure of diplomacy that blew up the Mukden railway line or shot up a radio station on the German/Polish border. Sometimes, dickheads just want a war.
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#45429
Did Corbyn know who this guy was? Probably not.

Would he have posed with him if he had? Probably not.

Would another high-profile politician who has a history of gaffes concerning being with the wrong people in the wrong place at the wrong time *possibly* think that - given he was attending a conference about a guy who is quite popular with the right wing as well - maybe take a few precautions and not pose with every random who pitches up? Probably.

Does Corbyn have a history of liking flattery and attention and not grasping when he’s being used or when the adoration is actually taking the piss? Probably.

Is this sort of lack of thinking why Jez is a fucking liability and should never have been leader? Definitely.
Malcolm Armsteen, zuriblue, Oboogie and 2 others liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#45562
Looking back at the last manifesto. Apparently this would have romped home apart from Brexit and Blairites attacking its brilliance.

https://www.ft.com/content/7364ee82-0c6 ... c8d9dc6d84

Aside from whether the costings and tax raisings are correct (all paid for by other people, yeah) the scale of the increase in spending is enormous. From 37.8% to 44% of GDP in 5 years. The FT and IFS point out that this is a lot, and there'd be very large misallocation.

Luckily John McDonnell was on hand to refute their arguments.
“The IFS assessment of Labour’s plans is that we are too ambitious – we accept that with pride. We are ambitious for our country and will be investing on the scale needed to end austerity, tackle climate change and build our country’s future.”
Not that the Tories were running as policy heavyweights, of course, but I reckon they could have rallied a few against this stuff.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#46269
Looking at the replies to this. It's amazing how little the online Corbynites know about local government. There's lots of it, so the chances are somewhere or other somebody will be changing parties. What matters is the direction of those- seemingly away from the Tories at the moment. That doesn't mean "Labour is the new Tory Party". Parties tend to happily accept defections, for obvious reasons. That doesn't mean "Tories are welcome in Starmer's Labour".

As an aside, I'm rather mystified by the conversion to PR among lots on the left. What do they think that's going to involve in practice, if not a lot of working with people who they regard as "Tories"?

  • 1
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 91
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]