:sunglasses: 57.1 % :pray: 4.8 % :laughing: 28.6 % :poo: 9.5 %
By davidjay
#37758
Youngian wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 5:36 pm
Abernathy wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 10:41 am The Absolute Boy was on Peston just the other night. Thankfully, Liz Kendall was also on hand to mitigate any potential damage by publicly handing him his arse.
The cult are in full hissy mode over Kendall’s lies about the great man :lol:
Would that be lies as in things that aren't true, or lies as in doubting his infallibility?
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#37838
Predictable stuff here. He's been told plenty of times who abolishing fees would benefit, but who can argue with a "fundamental right"? Which HE has never been, and wasn't in his manifestoes (otherwise presumably he'd have budgeted for 100% attendance). He's been all over, quite rightly, HE pay disputes. And the upshot of that experience is "let's abolish fees, apparently.

User avatar
By Crabcakes
#37848
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 11:16 pm Predictable stuff here. He's been told plenty of times who abolishing fees would benefit, but who can argue with a "fundamental right"? Which HE has never been, and wasn't in his manifestoes (otherwise presumably he'd have budgeted for 100% attendance). He's been all over, quite rightly, HE pay disputes. And the upshot of that experience is "let's abolish fees, apparently.

This is exactly why I think Corbyn is in many ways delighted to be out of the big job and would have been delighted not to win any elections. Because this is piss easy - yes to free things for all that are broadly popular with the right groups who will continue to say how wonderful he is, safe in the knowledge he will never have to put a moment’s thought into how such a thing might be paid for, what the knock-on effects of making it free might be, and what other service will have to lose out/cost will have to rise to cover it.

I know full well Labour being unfairly treated in terms of economics and being asked to cost things when the Tories don’t get questioned is a genuine thing. But this sort of thing is probably why it’s *still* a thing.
Abernathy, Spoonman, Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#37927
No surprise to see Jez signing this nonsense, which if I understand it, demands that the WASPI generation get paid state pensions from 60.

What the heck would the cost of that be, and how can it possibly be a priority*? Maybe the cost is £54bn seeing he and McDonnell pulled that figure out of their arse in the last week of the general election campaign. A good one for an independent Santa Claus candidate in Islington North armed with a "wealth tax" talking point while some meanie "neoliberal" for Labour has to point out what a daft idea this all is. I've no idea why you wouldn't just boost pension credit or boost whatever Incapacity Benefit is called now for older people who can't work.

* There were 3 different decisions made that affected this. The last one by Osborne was very sudden, and there's a case for some modest general compensation there. But the other two were well-trailed by Major and Brown. That's normal government policy, winners and losers, and we don't normally say that requires compensation.

https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-mot ... -the-1950s
By mattomac
#37938
Get rid of fees and you know what happens, governments balance books, less students go, some Universities go bust even though their widening participation structures are actually quite good.

All the while your university system is being filled up at the high class Universities with international students.

Squeeze at both ends means it no longer becomes open to all. Yes the system needs reforming and it needs reforming so the poorest can go debt free and that acts on a sliding scale. Easiest way would potentially be a graduate tax but it has its own pitfalls.
Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#37987
mattomac wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:21 am Get rid of fees and you know what happens, governments balance books, less students go, some Universities go bust even though their widening participation structures are actually quite good.

All the while your university system is being filled up at the high class Universities with international students.

Squeeze at both ends means it no longer becomes open to all. Yes the system needs reforming and it needs reforming so the poorest can go debt free and that acts on a sliding scale. Easiest way would potentially be a graduate tax but it has its own pitfalls.
Yep. Maintenance grants got squeezed by the SNP to keep up their free fees. This is much worse for poor students than having fees that they only pay back if they earn a lot.
mattomac liked this
  • 1
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 91
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]