:sunglasses: 50 % :pray: 6.3 % :laughing: 34.4 % :cry: 3.1 % :poo: 6.3 %
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#2307
This all sounds like panic.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ions-polls

They don't say as much, but sounds like they sort of think Johnson's spaffing is going to be successful. Much wiser heads than Johnson are pretty sceptical than it will. Don't fret yet. You can't spaff everywhere.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#2312
How so? I wish you'd show your working in these gnomic statements.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#2316
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 11:36 pm How so? I wish you'd show your working in these gnomic statements.
There wasn't a better way to swap two shadow cabinet members over? Why insist on her moving now anyway? You can't fuck with her, she's the Deputy Leader with a massive direct mandate.

We know that somebody leaked something to make her look bad (first class rail tickets, ffs). That's massively out of order. Starmer ought to be able to stop that happening.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#2318
The same applies to Burnham (he's just Tweeted his disapproval of the Rayner shuffle without, I suspect, any clear idea of what is actually going on).

There's a good reason he was never leader...
By mattomac
#2324
Wouldn’t surprise me if RLB is the leak or friends of hers, also the Nandy stuff has been put out their to rile the feathers of the right of the party, heard it one or two times and then it went.

Let’s face it, something has to change, and party chairman is a pretty rubbish role, isn’t it the kind you give to make someone pleased, shouldn’t even need to be an MP.

As for Burnham that statement today wasn’t the best political policy in the world, supposed to be a party.

As always with this I feel for those who feel they have to do everything for the party for months, they won’t say no to anything (those days are gone for me, though I did leaflet drop one afternoon) and then see this shit the day after the election.

Personally I’m no longer sure if Starmer is the right person, but it’s not any of the awkward posse on the far left,they haven’t taken any responsibility for the previous 5 years so a period of silence from them would be appreciated.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#2329
I'd suggest Burgon, but I don't think he's bright enough.
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#2346
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 5:26 pm Admittedly, this bloke is a Lib Dem, but he's a councillor (in Stockport). So I'll give him more credence than people saying he didn't mention it because it would give credence to Corbyn.

This is true but also a good example of how what I like to all Twlldun's law.

Tubby Isaacs liked this
User avatar
By Boiler
#2365
Well, this was entirely predictable... as is the inevitable BTL comment.

https://zelo-street.blogspot.com/2021/0 ... lling.html

A pause for reflection, but a Tory elsewhere joyfully quipped "Wasn’t it MacMillan of whom it was said 'greater love hath no man than to sack others for the sake of his career'?"
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 96
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]