- Sat Mar 12, 2022 11:56 pm
#22160
And I think that whilst that has happened and it's absolutely unacceptable, the controversy arises when that brush gets used to tar all transpeople, which happens way, way too much.
I can see pretty clearly how the trans community would be bloody belligerent with the continuous comparison to sex criminals, sporting cheats and perverts thrown at them day and daily.
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sat Mar 12, 2022 9:27 pmAbernathy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 12, 2022 8:48 pm “Trans women are women” says Keir Starmer. Uncontentious, you might think, but no, this seems to have rattled Joanne Rowling’s cage big time. Not entirely sure I understand why.I don't think anyone (certainly not here and certainly not Jo Rowling) would disagree with that. Her argument is against the idea that a man can change gender simply by asserting that he is now a woman, with no other actions or 'evidence' (such as living as a woman) on his part. This has, apparently, led to men declaring themselves to be trans and then gaining access to women-only spaces (women's refuges etc.), even prisons, where some have, allegedly, committed crimes against women.
Are trans women women? I dunno. What is a trans woman? It’s a woman who previously was not a woman, but is now.
And I think that whilst that has happened and it's absolutely unacceptable, the controversy arises when that brush gets used to tar all transpeople, which happens way, way too much.
I can see pretty clearly how the trans community would be bloody belligerent with the continuous comparison to sex criminals, sporting cheats and perverts thrown at them day and daily.
We regard capitalist journalism as an effective weapon in the hands of a well-informed, but utterly unscrupulous, enemy, rather than merely as an unbiased recorder of passing events.