Possibly because Labour just took a beating?
Just a thought.
Boiler wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:03 pm Another thread worth resurrecting.The equivalent thread on the old forum was started around 2006, and therefore probably initially consisted of chat regarding, for example, the merits of James Purnell, Ruth Kelly and Hazel Blears (each named of potential part leaders in a Guardian article around that time!).
Boiler wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:33 pm I know that I'm not in a good headspace at the moment since I stopped taking my little helpers, but I am finding it very difficult to be optimistic about Labour's future right now and more to the point, what sort of society we are headed towards.To put it in video game terms.
Samanfur wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:36 pm When I've seen Ed Miliband speak at conference, he always comes across very well. He's grown in confidence since his leadership, and the impression I get is that he was badly advised when it came to PR and image - if he'd been allowed to just be himself, he'd probably've come across a lot better.I don't think 'himself' was very impressive.
Boiler wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 7:05 pm This from a former shadow defence minister:Think that's rubbish. He's a reactionary probably getting some local heat. Hard to see Starmer is woke left.
A London-based bourgeoisie, with the support of brigades of woke social media warriors, has effectively captured the party.
Harsh, but fair?
obsessed with identity, division and even tech utopianism – have more in common with those of Californian high society than the kind of people who voted in Hartlepool yesterday.
Oblomov wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 7:20 pm Allotment Jesus on C4 news now saying Labour should have stuck to his failed manifestos of 2017 and 2019He's not trying is, he?
The lack of self awareness is actually excruciating.
Youngian wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 7:30 pm Sounds like Dominic Cummings. I’ve heard Khalid come out with Lexit populist stuff before. He’s talking about closed procurement contracts which I have no ideological objections to but can’t be bothered to list why this is a bad and moth eaten idea on so many levels. Bipartisan Peronism isn’t something I saw coming.See how clever the Peronism looks in 3 years time.obsessed with identity, division and even tech utopianism – have more in common with those of Californian high society than the kind of people who voted in Hartlepool yesterday.
Jeremy Corbyn has suggested Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party was “offering nothing” to voters.From the election winning expert.
Asked if Sir Keir should quit, the former Labour leader told Channel 4 News: “It’s up to him what he decides to do. “But the important thing is that this party represents a real, radical alternative to inspire people. “Offering nothing, offering insipid support for the government causes people either to vote for somebody else or simply to stay home and disappear.”
Boiler wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 4:33 pm I know that I'm not in a good headspace at the moment since I stopped taking my little helpers, but I am finding it very difficult to be optimistic about Labour's future right now and more to the point, what sort of society we are headed towards.Things change, and in the grand scheme of things quite quickly. It’s just hard to see it now, or where that comes from. 15 years ago Michael Howard was in charge of a ruined Tory party we thought would never come back together. 10 years ago we had the first coalition this country had seen for decades. Who knows where we’ll be 5 or 10 years from now?
We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]
The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]
All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]
this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]