Boiler wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 4:23 pm
And when the reason for those pre-Beeching, Beeching and post-Beeching closures once again becomes obvious? Cuts didn't just happen under Beeching, you know - most of the Midland and Great Northern Joint was closed in 1959.
Railways cost a bomb to reinstate as we've come a long way from wooden sleepers, jointed track and a manual signal box every couple of miles. Any "new" line should be built as electrified from the start, or at least have the piles sunk for the OHLE to be fitted with a minimum of disruption (Varsity Line 2.0, I'm looking at you). Never mind going for ERTMS, or the massive costs of rewriting software for adding these lines into the new ROCs.
Then let's factor in that a lot of people simply do not want to travel on what they see as "loser transport" with all the inconvenience of waiting for connections, changing modes of transport or even non-availability of public transport after certain times, but are utterly wedded to the personal door-to-door service their motor car offers. Their choice of environment, temperature and entertainment.
Yep. Beeching didn't close anything- Harold Wilson did, when he saw the numbers.
People don't get rail capacity at all. As far as they can see, if there's a line on a map, then it's all ok. If there isn't a line, then you've got to construct one.
In terms of getting people out of cars, you do that not by having a two carriage train trundling up and down every hour through a bunch of villages, but by having decent sized trains going fast and frequently between large towns.