:laughing: 100 %
User avatar
By Samanfur
#13371
More details in the link to the original Guardian article:

British billionaire's "I Am Not A Pornographer" letter raising questions already answered by the letter

Richard Desmond, a British billionaire who was formerly the propreitor of adult television channels and wank mags, does not wish to be known as a pornographer. In fact, he apparently feels it is illegal to call him such and is demanding that Wikipedia cease doing so.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#13373
Well, he shouldn't have run that company that published wank mags and shot and aired pornographic films then.

Fun fact - remember the old Express ads with a cheery paperboy shouting "Express delivery!"? Well, the voice came from Des's own son, and the ad was recorded in the Television X studios. Hope the kid was wearing shoe protectors.

In fact, "Express delivery!". Fnar fnar.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#13378
When #3 son was looking for work as a photographer/graphic designer a mate got him an interview at a place he didn't know much about.
Halfway through the interview two completely naked models showed up. Which surprised him, as the nature of the company hadn't been divulged at that point. Apparently they did this (they said) to see how he would react to nude women. I think it was a bit seedier than that.

Desmond's Filthorama.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#13397
The same story appears in "The Pornographer Diaries" by former wank mag journalist Danny King. Apparently a standard phasing test for new staff.

In fact, in the book the company owner bears a striking resemblance to guess who...
User avatar
By Abernathy
#13401
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Fri Nov 05, 2021 5:14 pm Apparently they did this (they said) to see how he would react to nude women.
What did they expect him to do? Whip out his todger and start frantically rubbing it like Aladdin summoning the genie ?
Last edited by Abernathy on Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By Oboogie
#13403
Abernathy wrote: Fri Nov 05, 2021 8:41 pm
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Fri Nov 05, 2021 5:14 pm Apparently they did this (they said) to see how he would react to nude women.
What did they expect him to do? Whip out his todger and start frantically rubbing it like Alladin summoning the genie ?
That's a fine image for a proud father to wrestle with....
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#13406
I think a lot of people expressed a degree of embarrassment...
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#15193
King described it as like applying for any job in journalism: take along some cuttings of your best bits, do a WPM typing test, show that you know the magazine's circulation and target demographic. Then once employed, write copy in time for the next edition.

He said that the main questions he was asked were do you meet the models, have you dated a model, are the letters real, and can you get me some free magazines? To which his answers were rarely, hell no, the mad ones yes and the competently written sexy stories no, and yes that I can do.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#30463
Epic Express fail in taking parody account for real - or did they?

By Bones McCoy
#30466
Samanfur wrote: Fri Nov 05, 2021 4:27 pm More details in the link to the original Guardian article:

British billionaire's "I Am Not A Pornographer" letter raising questions already answered by the letter

Richard Desmond, a British billionaire who was formerly the propreitor of adult television channels and wank mags, does not wish to be known as a pornographer. In fact, he apparently feels it is illegal to call him such and is demanding that Wikipedia cease doing so.
Not a pornographer - a wank magnate.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#38526
The Express online these days seems to consist entirely of "stories" about what was on the telly last night:
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment ... dcbcfb17ea
I mean, the John Bishop show is a load of old shite, but what it definitely isn't is "too political".
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#38533
The only evidence for that claim being
However, some ITV viewers claimed to "switch off" the programme within minutes, with many complaining it was "too political" for them.
No citations, of course.

And what was the 'crime'?
"Every show I try to start by talking about the events of the week and last week, I tried to avoid talking about politics.

"Because the problem with talking about politics on television is that you've got to provide a bit of a balance, and it's difficult.

"It's got so bad that even little Rishi Sunak has been asked whether the job is too big for him.
Wow, JB quoted Keir Starmer and the snowflakes had to switch off...


Chinny reckon.


>edit<

All I could find was this:



a Tweet by some knobhead.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#38539
Yes because everyone on the telly has a scrolling feed detailing all their political affiliations and opinions throughout their screentime.

I can't bear those flashing signs saying "Caution: her dad's a duke or something" whenever Kirstie Allsopp is on. Oh wait, no.
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]