Page 5 of 12

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 11:07 pm
by Bones McCoy
And just to lower the tone

Image

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 11:13 pm
by Bones McCoy
Image

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2021 4:22 pm
by zuriblue
Christ. Poor woman.
A2F50751-7DFA-49B3-845E-5192C53AEC0B.jpeg
A2F50751-7DFA-49B3-845E-5192C53AEC0B.jpeg (212.3 KiB) Viewed 5909 times

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2021 5:28 pm
by zuriblue
Like I said, poor woman. The Fourth Estate are cnuts.


Re: Hancock

Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2021 5:36 pm
by Youngian
Hancock’s a Tory tosser on stilts cliche. Left her on Thursday evening to give him time to find a bolt hole to hide in while his missus takes the shit. Also gave his wife Covid.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2021 5:57 pm
by Bones McCoy
Youngian wrote: Sun Jun 27, 2021 5:36 pm Hancock’s a Tory tosser on stilts cliche. Left her on Thursday evening to give him time to find a bolt hole to hide in while his missus takes the shit. Also gave his wife Covid.
To name a previous health secretary; "Warwick Hunt".

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2021 7:49 pm
by The Weeping Angel

Re: Hancock

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2021 9:20 am
by Crabcakes
I might *just* about have managed some limited understanding for Hancock having an office fling with a colleague who he’s known for years given the insane pressures of his job (which he was not very good at - thus making the pressure all the greater). Trench mentality and all that.

But the way he’s handled things with his wife and kids subsequently - and his immediate “yeah I’m off - wake the kids up so I can let them know” decision - makes me think he’s not so much a hapless, overpromoted weak man who makes bad decisions as a sociopath. Who also makes bad decisions. And that informs everything else he has done.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:00 am
by Bones McCoy
Who remembers:

Hancock said the footballers have too much money and should help the NHS.
So the captains raised a load of money, and Rashford helped feed hungry kids.
And all the Tories were angry about this.

So Hancock, and the bloke form the pub got all the rest of the money.
They handed it to the Horsey woman to ensure that all the pals got some.
And all the Tories were happy for a bit.

Then Hancock fucked the Italian woman, and the Tories were OK for a bit.
Because the Italians were on the other side of the draw.
And then the captains started kneeling down and the Tories were angry about gestures.
So they blamed Hancock, who decided that Horsey stuff made the tories happy and the football captains made them angry.

Then it turned out that some of the footballers were black.
(You don't get that problem with Jockeys).
So Hancock had to go.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 7:22 pm
by Youngian
Good to be out and about

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 8:06 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
What a tit.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 10:15 pm
by satnav
It would be interesting to know how many times he has visited his constituency in the last 12 months. I pretty sure that just before he resigned he admitted he had not been back to his constituency since November.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2021 10:24 am
by Boiler
Rewarding failure, part 137 of a series:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -in-africa
The UN under secretary general, Vera Songwe, said Hancock’s “success” in handling the UK’s pandemic response was a testament to the strengths he would bring to the role.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2021 1:25 pm
by mattomac
I did wonder how he would fail upwards, Hunt seemed to hit a trough once he felt he couldn’t lick the shit from that particular trough, but no doubt if he could he would probably be foreign secretary or chancellor now.

Same goes for Hancock, without the affair he might have returned in a top job once Boris went depending on the direction, however this sounds rather cushy. Anyone walking down the high street could probably do as good a job as Hancock.

It only required throwing lots of money at vaccine supply after negligence had led to 100,000+ deaths, because frankly it would have been double that if AZ and Pfizer hadn’t delivered.

He and the whole of that cabinet at the time did a total sum of nothing for 9 months, if they think such decision making deserves reward then I’m at a loss.

That report yesterday damned them, though it’s been in a book since DEC 2020 which you could buy called “Failures of State”

And this is one such one, along with Cummings and Johnson and Rishi with his eat out to help the death count.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 9:32 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Handcock has lost the Africa gig.



Oh dear, how sad etc.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:03 am
by Abernathy
I wonder what Damascene realisation has prompted this outbreak of good sense ?

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:15 am
by mattomac
Did they mistake him for someone else?

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:16 am
by Watchman
Thought they were getting Tony

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:22 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Abernathy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:03 am I wonder what Damascene realisation has prompted this outbreak of good sense ?
Apparently he can't do it whilst an MP. He must have missed that off his CV.

If I was him, I would.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2021 6:54 pm
by Abernathy
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:22 pm
Abernathy wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:03 am I wonder what Damascene realisation has prompted this outbreak of good sense ?
Apparently he can't do it whilst an MP. He must have missed that off his CV.

If I was him, I would.
I see. I had thought that the "technicality" stopping him from getting the job was that the UN didn't employ incompetents.