Page 4 of 12

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 12:19 pm
by Bones McCoy

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 4:26 pm
by kreuzberger
kreuzberger wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 11:18 am More like he can bring himself to let Cummings "win".

Meanwhile, Delta spreads like wildfire and the bodies keep piling up.
CAN'T...obvs. :shock:

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:20 pm
by The All New KevS
Resigned.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:32 pm
by zuriblue
The All New KevS wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:20 pm Resigned.
Presumably to spend time on the couch.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:46 pm
by Crabcakes
I hope this is the dam breaking.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:49 pm
by satnav
I thought he would be gone by 10pm tonight because the Sunday Newspapers would have gone for him big time if he tried to cling on to his job.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:56 pm
by Samanfur
zuriblue wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:32 pm
The All New KevS wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:20 pm Resigned.
Presumably to spend time on the couch.
All of a sudden, he has a desperate need to be with his children, according to his statement.

News 24 is currently interviewing Edwina Currie, who once she'd finished beatifying Hancock, went off on a long whinge about how she hates to see a competent minister forced out of their job by the tabloids over their private ife. After all, they're only human.

We weren't allowed to see the anchor's face during this.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:57 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Framing it as self-sacrifice, taking one for the team...

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:10 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Coladangelo has resigned from her 15 days-a-year £15k job...

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:12 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen


My thoughts (and I suspect yours).

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:28 pm
by Cyclist
I see the BBC website is already trying to set the narrative.

Not Handcock had to go because he's been found out as a corrupt, inept, lying morally bankrupt pissweasel with the blood of 127 thousand people on his hands.

No.

Matty was found out breaking Covid rules. Matty is very sorry and has done the decent thing. Poor Matty. Noble Matty.

They can fuck off, the lot of 'em.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:41 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Sky News, surprisingly, taking a similar line.
"We can all agree he's done a good job..."

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:54 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Javid.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:05 pm
by Bones McCoy
Samanfur wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:56 pm
zuriblue wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:32 pm
The All New KevS wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 6:20 pm Resigned.
Presumably to spend time on the couch.
All of a sudden, he has a desperate need to be with his children, according to his statement.

News 24 is currently interviewing Edwina Currie, who once she'd finished beatifying Hancock, went off on a long whinge about how she hates to see a competent minister forced out of their job by the tabloids over their private ife. After all, they're only human.

We weren't allowed to see the anchor's face during this.
Currie's always on about this "You can't runa government with angels" shite.
Never called if that's why she handed Savile the keys to Leeds General and Stoke Mandeville.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:13 pm
by Crabcakes
At least it’s not a big fan of Johnson in the role. And also, Hancock’s demise might see the end of his mate Dido Harding’s fingers getting in so many pies.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:55 pm
by Bones McCoy
With Hancock sacrificed, the client press can now set the narrative.
Brave Boris let down by bloody useless health secretary more focused on skirt than health.

Let's hope the few honest publications maintain focus on the shitshow across the board:
Late lockdowns, uncoordinated policies, crony contracts, the casino approach to international travel, 5 missed COBRAs ...

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:58 pm
by Spoonman
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:54 pmJavid.
That's Cumming's spitting feathers.

Could have been worse though, could have been Nadine Dorres.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 9:32 pm
by davidjay
davidjay wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:54 pm Of course, if Hancock does go, and I don't think he will, it won't be because he was indirectly responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths, or because in a cabinet that runs on corruption and cronyism he's the most corrupt and cronyist. It's because he was caught out shagging.

I got that one wrong....

But I think I can say with some certainty who the scapegoat for the Covid Clusterfuck will now be.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 10:22 pm
by Youngian
Bones McCoy wrote: Sat Jun 26, 2021 8:55 pm With Hancock sacrificed, the client press can now set the narrative.
Brave Boris let down by bloody useless health secretary more focused on skirt than health.

Might prompt the question as to who yields authority? Doesn’t look like its ‘case closed’ Boris.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2021 11:05 pm
by Bones McCoy
Bones McCoy wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:00 am I'm waiting for the "Eat out to help out" gags.
Image