Page 2 of 12

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 12:14 pm
by Crabcakes
Boiler wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 11:56 am Could be worse - it could be Corbyn in charge, taking advice from his brother.

As I read elsewhere, today... :roll:
To be fair, if Corbyn were in charge and really was taking advice from his brother it *absolutely* would be worse.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 1:31 pm
by Oboogie
No vaccines, no masks, no NHS.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 1:56 pm
by Andy McDandy
Lots of people over on That Twitter asking if Handcock really thinks the public has that short/bad a memory.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 2:10 pm
by Cyclist
Andy McDandy wrote: Thu Jun 10, 2021 1:56 pm ...if Handcock really thinks....
I'm struggling with this bit.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 2:55 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 4:23 pm
by Oboogie
My niece (who confusingly is a Sister) , was drafted into an ICU for a couple of months last year. She said they were wearing bin liners and Marigolds at one point and only had sufficient masks because they rang round the university science faculties and all the local dentists and vets.

I guess she must have lied about that.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 4:32 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Like our local head teachers who donated some of their school's safety equipment - which they are not reimbursed for...

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 7:35 pm
by Bones McCoy
I think Jimmy Hill deserves the last words on Hancock's half truths.

Image

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:48 pm
by kreuzberger
Mumblings on Twitter that Cumshot is about to let his evidence drop. Frankly, I can't be arsed to check, such is the loveliness of this seat on our balcony.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 10:28 pm
by Bones McCoy
Utter bullshit on twitter #72394



NEWS: UK and US agree new partnership to fight future pandemics and tackle health inequalities.


Let's contemplate what we can learn from 2 of the biggest failures on this pandemic.
Or what UK could learn from USA about health inequality.

I cannot believe that anybody typed that with a straight face.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2021 9:36 pm
by Samanfur

Re: Hancock

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2021 10:15 pm
by Andy McDandy
Saw the responses.

Donors saying that they made donations as individuals, not for the company, no longer associated etc.

Hancock saying nothing, except what's wrong with bigging up an innovative company.

Chinese walls, usual shit.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:01 am
by Andy McDandy
Seems he's been having an affair with a senior staffer in his department. Government saying it's a personal matter, n rules broken etc.

So, not just corrupt and professionally inept, but personally morally bankrupt too.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:23 am
by Cyclist
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:01 am

So, not just corrupt and professionally inept, but personally morally bankrupt too.
Just like his boss then.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:37 am
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:01 am Seems he's been having an affair with a senior staffer in his department. Government saying it's a personal matter, n rules broken etc.

So, not just corrupt and professionally inept, but personally morally bankrupt too.
And no social distancing rules were broken?

Image


Johnson has missed an opportunity to shitcan a scapegoat and walk out of Covid almost blame free.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:45 am
by Samanfur
Bones McCoy wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:37 am
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:01 am Seems he's been having an affair with a senior staffer in his department. Government saying it's a personal matter, n rules broken etc.

So, not just corrupt and professionally inept, but personally morally bankrupt too.
And no social distancing rules were broken?
That was what did for Neil Ferguson, so it'll be interesting to see how this plays out.

If "no rules were broken" is the best defence the government can give for Hancock appointing his mistress to a position where she gets basically £1k per day, it's looking ropey.

It's interesting to see the difference in how this is being covered compared to Johnson's serial philandering, though.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:49 am
by kreuzberger
Just in case anyone has forgotten; no tory minister finds themself on (or not on) the frontpage of the S*n by accident.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:00 am
by Bones McCoy
I'm waiting for the "Eat out to help out" gags.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:02 am
by Samanfur
kreuzberger wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 10:49 am Just in case anyone has forgotten; no tory minister finds themself on (or not on) the frontpage of the S*n by accident.
Exactly. That footage came from someone.

Re: Hancock

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:27 am
by kreuzberger
Bones McCoy wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:00 am I'm waiting for the "Eat out to help out" gags.
Even better...