Page 9 of 38

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:23 pm
by Watchman
Oboogie wrote: Sat Feb 05, 2022 9:30 am Mad Nad looking very shifty indeed, naked Boris just out of shot.

Why's she in Gloucestershire? I thought her constituency was in Bedfordshire

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:30 pm
by Cyclist
She moved to Tewkesbury about five years ago, about a year before she closed her constituency office here in Torytown, and has been sighted in her constituency only rarely ever since.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:43 pm
by Watchman
Ta. How popular is that with the locals?

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:53 pm
by Cyclist
Nearly as popular as our EU membership was.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:43 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Cyclist wrote: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:30 pm She moved to Tewkesbury about five years ago, about a year before she closed her constituency office here in Torytown, and has been sighted in her constituency only rarely ever since.
She's attracted a bit of local attention in Gloucestershire.

https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/n ... ts-6608004
Dorries mixes up MPs, supports PM on Savile slur and says Partygate is 'Remainer plot'

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:46 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Why does working class origins mean stupid, Danny?

Btw, Baroness Foster is an actual Tory member of the Lords- ie she wasn't selected by a small group of local members, the party leadership had to put her forward. Though you might make an educated guess at which leader did that.


Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 9:05 pm
by Boiler
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:43 pm
Cyclist wrote: Sat Feb 05, 2022 3:30 pm She moved to Tewkesbury about five years ago, about a year before she closed her constituency office here in Torytown, and has been sighted in her constituency only rarely ever since.
She's attracted a bit of local attention in Gloucestershire.

https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/n ... ts-6608004
Dorries mixes up MPs, supports PM on Savile slur and says Partygate is 'Remainer plot'
Christ, light must bend around Dorries.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 10:10 pm
by davidjay
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:46 pm Why does working class origins mean stupid, Danny?

Btw, Baroness Foster is an actual Tory member of the Lords- ie she wasn't selected by a small group of local members, the party leadership had to put her forward. Though you might make an educated guess at which leader did that.

Should members of the government really be putting pressure on the state broadcaster? We'd call that an attack on free speech anywhere else.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2022 10:35 pm
by RedSparrows
I'll happily call anyone fucking dumb, uh, fucking dumb.

Snowflakes.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 12:00 am
by davidjay
What the bollocking fuck does the rest of the world think of us?

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 1:42 pm
by zuriblue
119C2245-F6CE-4119-AA26-066829EBE814.jpeg
119C2245-F6CE-4119-AA26-066829EBE814.jpeg (83.59 KiB) Viewed 4024 times

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:57 pm
by Youngian
A plausible explanation

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 9:26 pm
by satnav
Apparently Mad Nad has been sent to Saudi Arabia on a charm offensive. What could possibly go wrong?

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 9:58 pm
by Andy McDandy
Well, it's a hell of a hospital pass.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:34 pm
by satnav
I suppose the trip will give her a good opportunity to dry out.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 10:38 pm
by kreuzberger
I'd imagine that the British Embassy compound will be safely oiled with all the Lambrini her dark heart might desire.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 8:19 am
by Watchman
satnav wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 9:26 pm Apparently Mad Nad has been sent to Saudi Arabia on a charm offensive. What could possibly go wrong?
Why do we need to send the so-called Culture Secretary, unless she’s doing a Truss….”greatest trade deal ever, I’ve just sold Saudi tv the rights to the entire works of Bernard Manning”

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 8:49 am
by Andy McDandy
I'm not sure they'd mind him so much.

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 12:33 pm
by Youngian
Nad’s been told to stick the script; ‘That would be an ecumenical matter.’

Re: Mad Nad

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:32 pm
by Nigredo
Youngian wrote: Sun Feb 06, 2022 6:57 pm A plausible explanation
In a recent Sunday Times article, Hastings praised Johnson as an excellent journalist. Rather confused me seeing as the former has been sacked twice for falsifying his output.