By Philip Marlow
#77068
It’s not like I cancelled my subscription over it, but since The Tower I’ve found it difficult to read O’Hagan’s stuff. The online version has added corrections now, but having read it again as a precursor to Butler’s piece it seems to me to be founded on a handful of rotten premises which render the thing unsalvageable. And that’s before you get to the tone deaf arrogance of his responses to criticism. Since he’s probably not going to apologise for all he got wrong, it’s good to have a corrective.
By Youngian
#77136
Philip Marlow wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2024 2:01 pm It’s not like I cancelled my subscription over it, but since The Tower I’ve found it difficult to read O’Hagan’s stuff. The online version has added corrections now, but having read it again as a precursor to Butler’s piece it seems to me to be founded on a handful of rotten premises which render the thing unsalvageable. And that’s before you get to the tone deaf arrogance of his responses to criticism. Since he’s probably not going to apologise for all he got wrong, it’s good to have a corrective.
Give us a synopsis as to why Andy O'Hagan's views on Grenfield as so bad. Is he an ultra deregulation libertarian?
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]