:laughing: 100 %
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#80213
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:47 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:27 pm Then there's nonsense like this.
I thought everyone agreed that it was bad when part of the budget was pre-briefed. Now the problem is that they didn't pre brief something in the budget?

This idea that a 1.2p rise in employers NI is causing unprecedented carnage is pretty implausible to me. The last government increased employers and employee NI and that got written up as clever parking tanks on Labour's lawn.
Someone made that point but she said it didn't count because the last one was temporary or something.
By NevTheSweeper
#80334
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 4:37 pm
NevTheSweeper wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 3:57 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:40 am By the way Nev since you applied to be a canidate FOUR times, what were the reasons given?
I was turned down on three occasions without an interview. On the fourth, I narrowly lost out on selection for a paper candidate.
I call bollocks on that. You don't run selections for paper candidates.
They did in my case.
By NevTheSweeper
#80336
davidjay wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 10:26 pm
NevTheSweeper wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 3:57 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:40 am By the way Nev since you applied to be a canidate FOUR times, what were the reasons given?
I was turned down on three occasions without an interview. On the fourth, I narrowly lost out on selection for a paper candidate.
For which party?
The Lib Dems. I was a Labour supporter in my youth, then I became a communist in the mid-nineties.

I joined the Lib Dems in 2003, because they were the opposition to Labour on my local council. Hence the selections. There was competition for selection for winnable seats.

In hindsight, the local party were right not to put me forward, even as a paper candidate.
By NevTheSweeper
#80339
Oboogie wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:06 pm
NevTheSweeper wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:45 pm The Labour government's agenda: here is what they have done so far....
https://bylinetimes.com/2024/12/03/gove ... ed-so-far/
Which of those reforms are you objecting to?
No plans to reverse WFA cut
No to electoral reform
No renationalisation of public utilities
Too much tinkering at the edges instead of putting a transformative vision to improving civil society
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#80341
Why would they reverse the WFA cut when they're committed to the triple lock? The Opposition aren't committed to it either.

I support PR, but it was ruled out and the election. And I'm wondering why Starmer's getting pressed on it all the time when the previous leader never was. See also trans rights. Starmer hasn't been very good, but I don't recall Jez being bombarded with questions about trans people on hospital wards, even though he had basically the same position (ie supported the principles of the Equality Act, which allows for single sex wards where they're considered reasonable).

Weren't you moaning about the budget reaction the other day? You now think they should be committed billions more to buy back energy companies? Where are they going to get cheaper gas from anyway? What difference would it make?
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#80344
The new approach on the crime of stalking may seem second division, but it's key and very important.
  • 1
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 54
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]