:sunglasses: 37.8 % :pray: 2.7 % :laughing: 32.4 % 🧥 8.1 % :cry: 8.1 % :🤗 2.7 % :poo: 8.1 %
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#21849
RedSparrows wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:51 am
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:54 am
Oblomov wrote: Thu Mar 03, 2022 2:37 pm
Yebbut Iraq
Come the inevitable heat death of the universe, the last sound uttered in the vast and infinite cosmos will be this.
I dunno, 'butteremails' might pip it.
I initially read this literally - as in ‘butter emails’, like ‘butterfingers’ - and thought there was a whole new thing that I’d managed to miss entirely!
User avatar
By Abernathy
#22563
Amazingly enough, Beckett’s bedfellow in calling for the immediate nationalisation of P&O, which is of course not going to happen, is none other than arch-Tory Ian Dale, who seemed to be quite transcendently angry at the ferry operator’s actions on his LBC show last night.

But Beckett’s problem, as usual, is that his call for nationalisation is typically and habitually a knee-jerk reaction . It is advocated by him as the catch-all solution to just about everything. In fact, there are circumstances in which the nationalisation of a company or industry would actually improve nothing, and may even be wholly innappropriate.

To say that this approach undermines Beckett’s credibility somewhat is something of an understatement.
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#22564
How do you nationalize something somebody doesn't want to sell? As I understand nationalizations before, they were the state taking on something that was failing in the private sector, like regional rail companies or more recently big banks. The previous owners were happy to do a deal for it. What happens if Dubai say "No thanks!" Do we keep upping our price till they bite our hand off and laugh like a drain? Or do we just pay what we want and take it?
User avatar
By Cyclist
#22566
Tubby Isaacs wrote:How do you nationalize something somebody doesn't want to sell? As I understand nationalizations before, they were the state taking on something that was failing in the private sector, like regional rail companies or more recently big banks. The previous owners were happy to do a deal for it. What happens if Dubai say "No thanks!" Do we keep upping our price till they bite our hand off and laugh like a drain? Or do we just pay what we want and take it?
I think that the preferred way would be to seize control. After all, the Jezzarite manual for government clearly states "property is theft", so why not just take it away from the capitalist scum and run it on behalf of the good socialist workers?
By Oboogie
#22586
Cyclist wrote: Sat Mar 19, 2022 6:52 pm
Tubby Isaacs wrote:How do you nationalize something somebody doesn't want to sell? As I understand nationalizations before, they were the state taking on something that was failing in the private sector, like regional rail companies or more recently big banks. The previous owners were happy to do a deal for it. What happens if Dubai say "No thanks!" Do we keep upping our price till they bite our hand off and laugh like a drain? Or do we just pay what we want and take it?
I think that the preferred way would be to seize control. After all, the Jezzarite manual for government clearly states "property is theft", so why not just take it away from the capitalist scum and run it on behalf of the good socialist workers?
Isn't seizing another country's assets an act of war?
By Youngian
#22594
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:03 pm I suppose we might pay the market value for P&O, in fairness. But do we do this every time there's an industrial dispute?
It would be profitable for the owners to give the company away. Neither the Tories (unusually) or RMT want to talk about the realities as to why P&O Ferries are losing money hand over fist. Here’s a clue; Irish ferry routes to the Continent are booming.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#23182
The Tory “pledge” is nothing more than a vague aspiration to hit the £10.50 minimum wage number in five years time.

Labour has aready correctly dismissed it as “a pathetic attempt to catch up”.

It’s also a transparently cynical political move by the Tories to try and wrongfoot Labour. Starmer is absolutely correct not to fall for it and engage in a phoney Dutch auction with the Tories. I think that by now quite a proportion of voters have realised that the Tories don’t give a fuck about raising living standards for ordinary working people.We ‘ll see what’s in the next Labour election manifesto.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... ge-by-2024
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#23183
Are Unite members as a whole really happy with this highly paid bloke spending all his time attacking the leader of the opposition?

Starmer didn't commit to a £15 minimum wage. He only said that people fighting for it (in Central London, remember) weren't asking for the earth. Starmer opposed the pay rise by the way, but had to "collect" because it wasn't possible to decline it.

User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#23186
He never sticks up links, does he?

I've looked this one up. There is a report that says this, by Tax Justice UK. Have a guess how much of the estimated £16bn excess profits come from Serco? £100m. Whether they're excess profits or not, this framing is misleading bollocks aimed at people who think they got £37bn for test and trace.

  • 1
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 144
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]