Page 1 of 30

Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Tue May 11, 2021 11:45 pm
by Youngian
Matt’s unaware of the translate button and thought he could get away this. The third country immigration Barnier is referring to has risen in the UK since Brexit, as has white emigration. What would Enoch make of it all?


Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Thu May 13, 2021 8:40 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Hang on, we weren't in Schengen.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Thu May 13, 2021 8:54 pm
by kreuzberger
As an aside, Barnier is talking bolleux absoluts.

Both France (Minitel) and Germany actively decided to deny themselves any digital advantage in the nineties and two-thousands. An influx of highly-skilled and entrepreneurial Indians, Chinese, and Americans would have helped then as it would now. There simply aren't enough Lithuanians to go round.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 8:10 am
by Youngian
I assume what Barnier’s saying is that third country immigrants from other Schengen countries are free to walk into France unchecked. Unless they’re working cash in hand they’re not going to stick around if they’re not entitled to work in France.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 4:31 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
"Chestfeeding" dominating public debate. Bad news for Labour as people think they might support it.

"Smash up property for the environment", says Keir Starmer.


Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 4:53 pm
by RedSparrows
Daily Mail poll shocker.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 5:02 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
It's even worse than normal. "Which party more likely...?"

"I don't think either party support that, do they?"
"But suppose one of them does. Labour or Coservative?"
"Well, I suppose Labour is more likely then"
"Labour! This is a terrible problem for Labour"

You could equally do.
"Which party would be more likely to cut nurses pay by 10%?"
"Neither of them"
"But which more likely?"
"I suppose the Tories froze pay before and said only 1% increase"
"The Tories! Bad problem for the Tories!"

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 5:24 pm
by Tubby Isaacs

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 9:19 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Goodwin's Legatum Institute have issued a report.


Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 10:05 pm
by mattomac
I know the SNP made massive cuts to further education whilst cover the cost of fees.

I didn’t include it in my presentation for a job in Scotland sadly.

Thing is that’s the first time I’ve ever heard of chest feeding.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 7:53 am
by Youngian
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 4:31 pm "Chestfeeding" dominating public debate. Bad news for Labour as people think they might support it.

"Smash up property for the environment", says Keir Starmer.

I know personal experience doesn’t count for shit but I encounter indifference towards the royal family at best among C2 and lower middle class Tory voters. Some very hostile, viewing them an expensive waste of space. Perhaps its a local Cromwell thing around these parts.

If Matt wants to fight the good fight against chestfeeding let him get on with it if it amuses him.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 9:39 am
by Boiler
I'd heard of "chestfeeding" before now but I lump that in with the vocal protest by a lone individual on Twitter objecting to a LNER CSM announcing "good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls" on the Tannoy, saying he felt excluded by it.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 10:05 am
by davidjay
This is the sort of rubbish we're fighting against on two fronts - the press who propagate it and the handful of Jezza's disciples who say it.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 10:56 am
by Youngian
Tony Blair hasn’t been helpful name checking ‘defund the police’ as an example of what’s wrong with the Labour left. It has about as much relevance in a British context as the NRA and not been used by any serious person in this country.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 11:11 am
by MisterMuncher
It's just fucking Winterval, rainbow sheep, banning conkers all over again, innit?


Also, that survey could serve as an exemplar of how to load questions to reach the desired results.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 11:17 am
by Youngian
Bought to you by a campaign for common sense. A sure sign of a right wally and caller to Any Answers

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 5:04 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
mattomac wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 10:05 pm I know the SNP made massive cuts to further education whilst cover the cost of fees.

I didn’t include it in my presentation for a job in Scotland sadly.

Thing is that’s the first time I’ve ever heard of chest feeding.
They cut the grants too.

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 6:21 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Now then.


Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 9:37 pm
by RedSparrows
Uh uh ruh uh but that doesn't compute with our narrative brzzzztttt brzzzttttt kaput

Re: Matthew Goodwin

Posted: Mon May 17, 2021 10:01 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
He says later that views of immigration does seem to be a cultural difference with the average. Hence, I guess, Brexit.