:sunglasses: 57.1 % :pray: 4.8 % :laughing: 28.6 % :poo: 9.5 %
User avatar
By Cyclist
#22043
He warned about Putin and his oligarchs in the same way as he brokered peace in Northern Ireland.

If he was so aware of the threat from Russia why was he never off the English -language Russian state TV channel?

His supporters can't even lie convincingly, and think our memory-span is somewhat shorter than that of the average goldfish.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#22079
Abernathy wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 6:16 pm Mailwatchers will no doubt remember Corbyn’s “warning” about Vladimir Putin when Russia attacked people in Salisbury and Amesbury with lethal Novichok poison. Mostly because it consisted of suggesting that we should send a sample of the Novichok to Vlad and asking him to check whether it was some of his stuff.

Thank Dawkins that Abbott’s political career must surely be nearly over.
Oboogie liked this
By RedSparrows
#22123
mattomac wrote: Sat Mar 12, 2022 3:14 pm I’m slightly disappointed with Peter Oborne he is usually better than this.
He's right about the double standards of Johnson being a fucking clown on this stuff, but Corbyn's geopolitical thinking has only ever stretched as far as 'Moscow good, Washington bad'. It's that stupidly simple.
kreuzberger, Oboogie, mattomac and 1 others liked this
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#22318
Peter Oborne seems to have some strange bond with Corbyn. Sure, they agree on some Middle East stuff, but surely Oborne is the opposite on European security?

Corbyn certainly did criticize Putin when others were being nice to him. But that makes Corbyn's NATO stuff even more eccentric. "This terrible man is in charge of Russia. Let's disband NATO and let that guy put the Soviet Empire back together". That's even worse than the Tories who wanted cash but are steadfast in support of NATO.
Nigredo liked this
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#22329
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:37 pm Peter Oborne seems to have some strange bond with Corbyn. Sure, they agree on some Middle East stuff, but surely Oborne is the opposite on European security?

Corbyn certainly did criticize Putin when others were being nice to him. But that makes Corbyn's NATO stuff even more eccentric. "This terrible man is in charge of Russia. Let's disband NATO and let that guy put the Soviet Empire back together". That's even worse than the Tories who wanted cash but are steadfast in support of NATO.
He has to be on the right side of history though.

User avatar
By Crabcakes
#22399
It’s a bit like the ultra-petty hair splitting that Peter Hitchens does when people say he writes for the Mail, and he shits the bed because *he* writes for the *Mail on Sunday*.

Corbyn may have been consistent on Putin, but he was also consistent on his forgiveness for/turning a blind eye to the actions of Putin’s Russia - from Stop the War’s very selective choice of what wars to stop to Corbyn’s desire to get Russia’s expert opinion on whether it was one of their nerve agents that killed someone in Salisbury.

Anyone can always be on the right side of history of big, obvious movements if you’re willing to ignore their own history of being catastrophically wrong on occasions where it was much more down to their own personal judgement.
  • 1
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 91
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]