:sunglasses: 23.5 % :pray: 11.8 % :laughing: 32.4 % :cry: 26.5 % :poo: 5.9 %
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#81586
I've just seen the New Orleans chief of police describing the pickup-attack killer as 'pure evil'.

Always they go to the religious/mythical cause, not looking at the real causes, such as political disaffection, American exceptionalism and a putrid mental health service. it's so much easier to fall back on that dim witted phrase. Requires no reflection or critical thought.
By Oboogie
#81587
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:07 pm I've just seen the New Orleans chief of police describing the pickup-attack killer as 'pure evil'.

Always they go to the religious/mythical cause, not looking at the real causes, such as political disaffection, American exceptionalism and a putrid mental health service. it's so much easier to fall back on that dim witted phrase. Requires no reflection or critical thought.
It's washing hands of any responsibility - evil exists, that's a fact because it's in the Bible. Therefore, the only way to combat evil is through prayer, anything else is futile!
User avatar
By Abernathy
#81602
Youngian wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:01 pm IRA made "cowardly attacks." Would brave attacks have been OK and what was the criteria that would change a cowardly attack into a brave one?
This. Emphatically this. I have long wondered about this boilerplate supposed denunciation of terrorist and other atrocities as “cowardly”. Why on earth is such an act deemed to be “cowardly”, and why should that be such a very bad thing? Apart from anything else, it seems to me that (for example) undertaking a mission to blow yourself, and your target victims, to pieces by means of a “suicide vest”, necessitates a measure of courageous fortitude, however deluded by religious fanaticism, that is quite a long way from being “cowardly”. Is cowardice really such a characteristic as to warrant this maximal denunciation ?
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#81606
Abernathy wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 7:57 pm
Youngian wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 3:01 pm IRA made "cowardly attacks." Would brave attacks have been OK and what was the criteria that would change a cowardly attack into a brave one?
This. Emphatically this. I have long wondered about this boilerplate supposed denunciation of terrorist and other atrocities as “cowardly”. Why on earth is such an act deemed to be “cowardly”, and why should that be such a very bad thing? Apart from anything else, it seems to me that (for example) undertaking a mission to blow yourself, and your target victims, to pieces by means of a “suicide vest”, necessitates a measure of courageous fortitude, however deluded by religious fanaticism, that is quite a long way from being “cowardly”. Is cowardice really such a characteristic as to warrant this maximal denunciation ?
Try saying the terrorists bravely bombed us to yourself and seeing how it sounds.
  • 1
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]