:laughing: 100 %
User avatar
By Abernathy
#39692
So the declared contenders thus far are:

Kate Forbes : Stalwart of the Wee Frees , self-declared homophobe & bigot.

Humza Yusaf : Current Health Minister in the Scottish government, in which post he has not exactly covered himself in glory (check the state of the NHS in Scotland).

Ash Regan : Relatively new politician who resigned as a minister over the Gender Recognition (Scotland) Act last year.

Not exactly an inspirational line-up. I guess there’s still time for more candidates to declare, but I’m fucked if I know who they might be.

On the bright side, I can only see Sturgeon’s departure as benefitting Labour’s chances of recovering a decent number of Scottish seats.
By mattomac
#39696
They are appallingly poor.

I can only think Forbes is trying to pave the way for Ash Regan to be seen as a moderate. Regan might be able to keep it about together but Forbes won’t. Greens will want out and there isn’t many people now around who think gay marriage is an issue, basically the Liberal wing will splinter, it really is a test to see what the party effectively is.

A single issue has dominated the party and country for far longer than it has been useful, the Tories are starting to see it with Europe.

The only winner from this would be Anas Sarwar the Labour leader.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Abernathy
#39732
Arrowhead wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 11:48 am Rumour is that one of the SNP Westminster contingent may throw their hat in the ring at the last minute.

Not sure who that might be - Mhairi Black, perhaps? Ian Blackford would’ve been an obvious contender at one stage, but not anymore I suppose.
Blackford, like Forbes, is also a "Wee Free" - a member of the Free Church of Scotland - and may harbour views similar to those of Forbes on equal marriage, though he has sensibly never aired such views in public. In any case, I think he has already ruled himself out.

I don't think Black has the cojones, or the credibility, to go for it.
Oboogie liked this
By Bones McCoy
#39761
This morning Forbes, or the Tories who want Forbes (It wasn't clear which) are busy playing the
I'm entitled to my views and should be debarred from public life on account of them.
Card.


Does it bear much analysis?

Can a person with fundamentalist approach to Calvin's "elect" justly represent all their members without playing favourites?
It's a difficult one, Ian Paisley Sr. was praised for representing all his constituents despite his bigoted image.
He's also something of an exception with his community in receiving that praise.

Can somebody with such socially conservative views represent the current trajectory of the SNP?
I'm sure the SNP still include a number of traditional "Tartan Tories" in their ranks.
I think they're eccentric exceptions, Conservatism and the Independence movement having parted ways several decades back.

Is she getting a sympathetic hearing because she's the Tories favoured candidate?
You may think that.
That's entirely a matter for you.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#39763
She's entitled to her views, but she's not entitled to a role in public life. If her views offend enough people, she will be voted out.

Also, her views are, what with her being a public figure, up for discussion. Especially if they might impact on how she carries out her publicly funded job. Also, others are entitled to challenge her views.

On that basic level of idiocy and unawareness of how her own job works, she should be put in the corner with some crayons to chew.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#39781
It’s not just Forbes’ self-admitted homophobic bigotry that grates. She comes across as being none too bright, and even a bit stupid. Maybe it’s my own long-standing view of people who espouse and propagate myth and superstition as a road-map for human society as necessarily a bit thick, but Forbes, by comparison to the obviously formidably intelligent Sturgeon, definitely seems to be a couple of cards short of a full deck. Quite difficult to comprehend how she comes to believe that she is fit to lead, and how she has garnered support for her leadership bid (though not hard to understand why that support is falling away following the declaration of homophobia). It’s almost, dare I say it, quite Trussian (to coin an adjective).
User avatar
By Spoonman
#39816
Ms. Forbes is perfectly entitled to hold the religious beliefs she has. At the same time, those with the power to elect a new SNP leader & the electorate at large can decide wherever the beliefs she holds are either compatible or likely to cause undesirable policies/outcomes down the line for the political office role(s) she seeks.

That's fairly simple on its own, but I wonder if Grimes or Badenoch give the same leeway to all shades of religious & political thoughts willing to participate in a mainstream Western European democracy? Given past form by themselves and whom they travel with, I doubt it.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#39821
Mainstream being the key word there. As long as you brand it mainstream, it's OK. Bit like commentators in 2017 lining up to describe Arlene Phillips as a "perfectly normal unionist with many ideas shared by the bulk of conservative voters".
User avatar
By Spoonman
#39823
Andy McDandy wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 9:33 am Mainstream being the key word there. As long as you brand it mainstream, it's OK. Bit like commentators in 2017 lining up to describe Arlene Phillips as a "perfectly normal unionist with many ideas shared by the bulk of conservative voters".
I assume you mean Arlene Foster and not the choreographer & former SCD judge?

If so, Foster herself is Church of Ireland, therefore Anglican. Still quite an unpleasant woman tho'.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#39828
Yes, Foster. My bad.

But yeah, you had all manner of cunts crawling out of the woodwork saying that the DUP stance on abortion, gay rights etc was perfectly normal. Right up until the Tories didn't need them any more.
Abernathy, Spoonman liked this
User avatar
By Spoonman
#39832
To be fair, I'd imagine that there are quite a few otherwise "mainstream" people in Britain that would regard the moral stances of the DUP as being perfectly normal - a small but noisy minority, mind, often seen in the comments section of the M**l & E*press as well as elsewhere.

What 2017 did display though was the large disconnect between the public & political classes of GB & NI where the DUP had to be effectively "introduced" to GB audiences. Though that did nothing to change the perception that the DUP's idea of Britishness was alien to most of GB outside of the west of Scotland.

But going back to Ms. Forbes, she's essentially in a position where should she become the next SNP leader, she'd ultimately have to moderate her public positions for the benefit of her party otherwise all hell will break loose - there's (from what I see) no chance of the Free Presbyterian CoS making an infiltration/takeover of the party, as opposed to the DUP which essentially was an outgrowth of the political wing of a similarly evangelical Calvinist sect.
Andy McDandy liked this
User avatar
By Yug
#39853
Kemi Badenoch probably looks up to Alexander Stewart and aspires to be like him

The Wolf of Badenoch - Scotland's vilest man?

He was known as the Wolf of Badenoch - or sometimes the Celtic Attila.

The cruel rampages of Alexander Stewart, Earl of Buchan, were deadly - and his appetite for destruction of his foes simply terrifying...

https://www.scotsman.com/whats-on/arts- ... man-647369
Arrowhead liked this
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]