:sunglasses: 46.2 % :laughing: 23.1 % 🧥 7.7 % :cry: 7.7 % :poo: 15.4 %
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#11559
Allons enfants de la patrie!
kreuzberger liked this
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#12265
Look, I’m not saying anything one way or the other. But it’s worth noting that Phil started out “resting for a few days” and about 3 months later he was dead.

It may be King George VII (as Chuck is thinking of going by) is going to be in situ sooner rather than later.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... ld-to-rest
By Oboogie
#12422
Buckingham Palace: “Following medical advice to rest for a few days, The Queen attended hospital on Wednesday afternoon for some preliminary investigations, returning to Windsor Castle at lunchtime today, and remains in good spirits.”

So they kept her in overnight, did they? They don't do that without reason.
User avatar
By Cyclist
#12430
Don't read too much into the overnight stay. This isn't the Luton and Dunstable they're talking about. It's a very exclusive, very expensive hotel with added medical facilities. If we had the money we could check ourselves in for a night or two, for a check over by a very expensive doctor and a therapeutic dip in the swindle bath.
By The All New KevS
#12432
Twas ever thus with the Royals though. Appreciate it was 70 years ago but George VI went swiftly from "bit under the weather" to dead very quickly. His lung cancer was never made public beforehand, I believe.

Saying that though, I suspect it would be a little bit different now. When Pope JP2 hopped the twig there were constant updates on his health - going from "seriously ill" to "gravely ill" to "nearing his end". I suppose though on the other hand, the Palace wouldn't want speculation and fuss on what is, let's face it, a private matter.

I don't think there's any cause for over concern here - as everyone is saying, she is halfway through her 96th year after all.
Oboogie liked this
By The All New KevS
#12439
Oboogie wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 12:08 pm
The All New KevS wrote: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:55 am the Palace wouldn't want speculation and fuss on what is, let's face it, a private matter.
I don't know what happens to the NHS principle of patient confidentiality when it comes to the Queen.
It'd be the Palace providing updates though, not the NHS. It's no different if you've been told by the hospital how somebody is, and then you announce it to the world. The NHS has provided the information to you as a family member/friend/whatever. What you choose to do with that info is not their concern.
Oboogie liked this
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 21
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]