Page 49 of 276
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 6:16 pm
by Spoonman
mattomac wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 5:44 pm
Yet another one
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63177669
Conor Burns is expendable.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 6:37 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Spoonman wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 6:16 pm
Conor Burns is expendable.
So should Owen Paterson and Chris Pincher been, but Johnson tried to keep hold of them.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 6:58 pm
by Oboogie
Spoonman wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 6:16 pm
mattomac wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 5:44 pm
Yet another one
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63177669
Conor Burns is expendable.
Seems so. Is he a smokescreen to save Suella Braverman?
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politic ... 31107.html
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:14 pm
by Youngian
No details as to why Connor Burns is suspended apart from it happened in the bar at party conference. Did he touch up Liz?
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:18 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Why not, it appears everybody else has.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:22 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Sub-Republican bollocks. The evidence that Sadiq Khan is failing on crime is... a short clip of him talking about something else, perhaps in response to a question on it.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:25 pm
by Oboogie
Youngian wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 7:14 pm
No details as to why Connor Burns is suspended apart from it happened in the bar at party conference. Did he touch up Liz?
Seems unlikely as Burns is gay.
Twitter rumour is 'it' occurred at an LGBTQ fringe event and Burns' conduct has been compared to Chris Pincher. No source given and I've no idea if that's accurate.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 8:17 pm
by Watchman
Maybe if Burns had been “touching up” Pincher, will they claim one cancels out the other therefore everything’s ok
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:23 pm
by Youngian
Apparently, Burns is known to his friends as carpet.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:35 pm
by kreuzberger
The Burns scandal seems to be so toxic that the news seepage is as tight as a seventeen year-old researcher.
That would indicate, to me at least, that there is more than hanky-panky to be dealt with. Rather there is a victim and perhaps even very real concern for their well-being.
That might also suggest that there have been criminal actions, and it would come as no surprise that tories would want to rapidly wash their hands of the whole affair.
Am I being too cynical?
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:47 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
kreuzberger wrote: ↑Fri Oct 07, 2022 9:35 pm
The Burns scandal seems to be so toxic that the news seepage is as tight as a seventeen year-old researcher.
That would indicate, to me at least, that there is more than hanky-panky to be dealt with. Rather there is a victim and perhaps even very real concern for their well-being.
That might also suggest that there have been criminal actions, and it would come as no surprise that tories would want to rapidly wash their hands of the whole affair.
Am I being too cynical?
I wonder if it's "that bad". You don't have to be a political genius to see that Johnson hanging on to Pincher didn't go well.
But it would also be on brand for it to be very bad, you I wouldn't bet against you.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 10:17 pm
by kreuzberger
Anyway, the Spice Girls are getting involved so that will light the blue touch paper for the Sundays.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 10:38 pm
by Youngian
I wonder if it's "that bad". You don't have to be a political genius to see that Johnson hanging on to Pincher didn't go well.
Sounds plausible. As Starmer puts a bit of stick about if MPs step out of line, he’s always in a position to castigate the Tories from on high. If Truss doesn’t take action Keir gets free punches; sleaze, indecision, not up to the job, weak, desperate to hold onto ministers.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 10:46 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
More from Greg. People did vote Conservative, 4 times since Ed Miliband was in Government. I think this one is on you.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2022 7:22 am
by Youngian
Welcome to the BlueKIP bunfight: Libertarian moonbeams Vs Culture war populists. Timothy you may recall was the strategist who wrote Theresa May’s poisonous ‘citizens of nowhere’ speech and lost seats to Jeremy Corbyn in a GE.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2022 4:10 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Just stringing words together that sound serious.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 12:14 am
by Bones McCoy
Connor "Third Degree" Burns (Cos he got a thid class degree Geddit!!).
Suspended for using HoC notepaper for intimidatory messages during a dispute involving family business.
The source of the "Ambushed by cake" quote.
Fekim!!
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 3:31 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Zahawi does his best to show he'd have been even worse than Kwarteng.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:11 pm
by Samanfur
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 12:14 am
Connor "Third Degree" Burns (Cos he got a thid class degree Geddit!!).
Suspended for using HoC notepaper for intimidatory messages during a dispute involving family business.
The source of the "Ambushed by cake" quote.
Fekim!!
The version of events I saw said that he'd touched up a male researcher. Given that he was listed on the Pestminster list back in the day for serially doing that, it seems plausible.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:58 am
by Crabcakes
This list of Tory MPs with some sort of corruption or crime against their name is just absolutely staggering. You think it must end soon, yet it keeps on going and going.