Scargill did waste time on women at Greenham Common who were apparently all lesbians.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2024 10:01 pm
by Abernathy
.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2024 9:01 am
by Watchman
That the Clapton hounds?
Apparently one on the Kent/Surrey border
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2024 7:08 pm
by davidjay
Can someone with more experience than me tell me if there's ever been a politician in the UK who has gained so much attention without ever having a single serious policy?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2024 9:49 pm
by Abernathy
davidjay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 7:08 pm
Can someone with more experience than me tell me if there's ever been a politician in the UK who has gained so much attention without ever having a single serious policy?
Nope. I tried, but I can’t think of a single one.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2024 10:36 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Alec Douglas-Home?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:10 pm
by Andy McDandy
Galloway?
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2024 9:04 pm
by davidjay
Douglas-Home was PM and Foreign Secretary while Galloway only ever appeals to a small demographic obsessed with his latest cause. Farage gets uncritical national coverage every time he steps out of his house.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2024 10:12 pm
by satnav
Whilst Farage is often in a hurry to threaten legal action I'm surprised that more people haven't sued Farage over some of his comments. Hope not Hate sued him back in 2016 and got a half hearted apology from him and Jeremy Corbyn threatened him with legal action back in March but didn't seem to follow through.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2024 10:20 pm
by davidjay
On that subject, surely this is at the very least questionable:
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:32 am
by Oboogie
If Farage actually had anything on Starmer no force on earth would keep him quiet, his silence is proof that he's lying again.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 1:40 am
by The Weeping Angel
Starmer is currently grieving for his brother so for Fargle to come out with that is beneath contempt.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:29 am
by Youngian
The prick is fuelling a conspiracy theory. How Starmer can make his former clients' identities a secret, I don't know. But Farage's fans are very stupid so it doesn’t matter.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:22 am
by Andy McDandy
It's the usual crap - "Aaaaah, what's he not telling us?". Then let your moronic followers fill in the gaps. Obama's birth certificate all over again. Or indeed, Murdoch journalism since time immemorial.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:51 pm
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:22 am
It's the usual crap - "Aaaaah, what's he not telling us?". Then let your moronic followers fill in the gaps. Obama's birth certificate all over again. Or indeed, Murdoch journalism since time immemorial.
They filled the gaps and it goes something like this.
The father of the Southport killer ...
Was a Rwandan war criminal ...
Who was (something something) and represented in court by STARMER!!!
And got his Fifty grand, free house and car and flat screen telly; and license to kill.
It's the latest variant on "flood the zone".
But instead of chucking out several conspiracies in a Gish gallop.
You knit them all together in an impossible to untangle dog-whistle-harmonica.
Re: Nargle Fargle
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2024 5:20 pm
by davidjay
Since the day he became Prime Minister Starmer has had to endure an unprecedented series of attacks on his personal and professional reputation. None of them are followed up because there's no evidence so the mob moves onto the next lie. Farage knows there's no truth in any of the smears and adds fuel to the fire by making vague comments such as these. He's dangerous and him answering for his actions is long overdue.
How hard can that be? Farage claims he’ll employ top professionals like ex judges. In reality it will be GB News presenters, Matt Goodwin and Norman Brennan.