Page 40 of 152

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2022 5:49 am
by mattomac
Did notice several shots at Corbyn, problem is if that’s all they’ve got then their is a major flaw in fighting the 2019 election in 2024.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:52 am
by Youngian
mattomac wrote: Wed Feb 23, 2022 5:49 am Did notice several shots at Corbyn, problem is if that’s all they’ve got then their is a major flaw in fighting the 2019 election in 2024.
Wasn’t it pathetic. A two year old diatribe about how you couldn’t trust Labour on security under Corbyn is all Johnson has in the bag. Labour can now go in all guns blazing on Russian oligarch money bankrolling the Tories with credibility now that idiot Corbyn has gone.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:57 am
by Cyclist
Youngian wrote: Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:52 am Labour can now go in all guns blazing on Russian oligarch money bankrolling the Tories with credibility now that idiot Corbyn has gone.
With the added help from Johnson himself. His pathetic "sanctions" are little more than a slap on the wrist, and could be spun as a warning to Russian Tory donors to move their liquid assets and lie low for a while.

This stuff just writes itself.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2022 5:56 pm
by mattomac
I would like the White House to put on record that it has concerns with the UK governments links to Russia.

C’mon Biden ;)

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 5:32 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Check out the reaction BTL to this, from the usual lot. Absolutely juvenile. 6% Greens are very squeezable and 11% Lib Dem base is good for tactical voting.


Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 9:16 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
You'd think this were margin for error or a very modest rally around the flag in a war. Unless you were posting BTL here, and it's a devastating rebuke to Starmer.


Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:51 pm
by davidjay
Haven't they changed the way the data is interpreted?

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:54 pm
by mattomac
Yup from what I read of it they expected those voters to return in 2024 so the Tories are still behind of course if they do what they did in 1997 then it’s a blood bath, which was sit it out.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:45 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Thanks, Seb. Labour's position on NATO is popular and right. And there's some useful housekeeping being done.

But, sure, it must be driven by polling. And something about "New Labour", which suggests they'd invade Iraq again- which wouldn't be right or popular. Must be polling-driven.


Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:29 pm
by mattomac
Payne needs to hope his paperback version is still relevant

There is no reason why Labour should not to be pro nato

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 2:37 pm
by Nigredo
mattomac wrote: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:29 pm Payne needs to hope his paperback version is still relevant

There is no reason why Labour should not to be pro nato
Yebbut Iraq

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:20 pm
by davidjay
Oblomov wrote: Thu Mar 03, 2022 2:37 pm
mattomac wrote: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:29 pm Payne needs to hope his paperback version is still relevant

There is no reason why Labour should not to be pro nato
Yebbut Iraq
Is the answer to everything.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 11:32 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Or Syria, where lots of people seem to believe the UK and US did the shit Assad and Putin did.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:54 am
by Andy McDandy
Oblomov wrote: Thu Mar 03, 2022 2:37 pm
Yebbut Iraq
Come the inevitable heat death of the universe, the last sound uttered in the vast and infinite cosmos will be this.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:02 am
by Bones McCoy
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:54 am
Oblomov wrote: Thu Mar 03, 2022 2:37 pm
Yebbut Iraq
Come the inevitable heat death of the universe, the last sound uttered in the vast and infinite cosmos will be this.
Uttered by Owen Jones' brain in a lab jar.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:51 am
by RedSparrows
Andy McDandy wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 8:54 am
Oblomov wrote: Thu Mar 03, 2022 2:37 pm
Yebbut Iraq
Come the inevitable heat death of the universe, the last sound uttered in the vast and infinite cosmos will be this.
I dunno, 'butteremails' might pip it.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 12:21 pm
by Youngian
Those who predicted it would take years to detoxify the party will enjoy reading this article and more than happy to be wrong.
How Keir Starmer Defeated The Left To Seize Control Of The Labour Party

One memorable, if rather bizarre, incident perhaps typifies the marginalisation of the left in the post-Corbyn era.
In November 2020, just days after Starmer had finally secured his NEC majority, a virtual meeting of the ruling body convened to decide who would become its chair. Veteran MP Margaret Beckett, a former foreign secretary who had served as temporary party leader following the death of John Smith in 1994, was seen as the mainstream choice, but was opposed by the left.
The meeting took place barely 48 hours after Starmer had refused to restore the Labour whip to Corbyn over comments he made in response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s report into anti-Semitism in the party when he was leader. This meant the left caucus were already spoiling for a fight.
They disapproved of Beckett, arguing that Ian Murray of the Fire Brigades Union should become NEC chair instead. With no hope of carrying the day, 13 of them staged a walkout – a protest which lost a lot of its impact on Zoom. Among the rebels was Unite’s Howard Beckett (no relation), who spent a minute stabbing at his screen trying to remove himself from the meeting while the others on the call looked on dumbfounded.
“Nothing sums up the left’s impotence more than a red-faced Howard trying and failing to hang up,” recalled one eyewitness. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... 86be203a49

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:16 pm
by davidjay
Getting rid of the poison inside the machine will be the easy bit. The hard work will be convincing the Labour Are Commies brigade that Corbyn's influence has gone.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 11:13 pm
by RedSparrows
Problem is what's the use? Idiots will believe it forever.

Re: Keir Starmer

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 11:45 pm
by mattomac
It’s convincing those that can be, the rump say 30-35% won’t.

It’s those we don’t want turning out.