Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Abernathy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:05 pm You know, for a minute there, I thought that the Cunt Olympics was an actual thing. It really should be.

I've a good mind to reserve the domain name.
Give Xitter and BBC speak yore branez a run for their money.

RedSparrows wrote: ↑Sat Sep 21, 2024 9:36 pm

Abernathy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 21, 2024 8:05 pm You know, for a minute there, I thought that the Cunt Olympics was an actual thing. It really should be.

New thread!

Sadly Olympics happen once every four years.

Cunts happen 24 x 7 x 365.25 x 4.

This has got to be either a parody or illegal:

I assume “ bring details of NI number etc” implies “only indigenous population may attend”

Bank details: sounds like those Indian gentleman who regularly call me and swear they're from Microsoft customer help.

davidjay wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 10:38 pm This has got to be either a parody or illegal:

It's a parody account.

Reform Exposed may be, but Poe's law applies to the "advice sessions" for sure.

Quick Googling brings up nothing much. News stories about Fargle and the Speaker's Office, and not much else. Clacton Libraries have details of councillor surgeries, while the Parliament site just tells you to contact Frog Man directly. And I'm not soiling my PC by visiting the party site.

Ah the old I'm being silenced routine.

So what exactly has been “covered up”; multiple witnesses have identified the single perpetrator, his background has been examined and reported on, by the sort of newspapers Fargle reads……pray tell Nigel, what are you inferring

I think it has something to do with this.

Not being on X, nor wishing to be, could you please provide a short summary?

Meanwhile, he's doing a certain hand gesture in that clip. Just needs to practise it with his right hand and he'll be spot on.

Ok basically this this person claims to have unocovered documents which 'prove' that Starmer defended the suspect's father which therefore make Starmer responsible for what happened in Southport.

Well, that's pretty tenuous, even if true. Slim. Positively anorexic. Skeletal.

The problem is this stuff gets believed and then amplified.

Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2024 6:32 pm Well, that's pretty tenuous, even if true. Slim. Positively anorexic. Skeletal.

But conclusive proof that #Starmermustresign .

The story is not being suppressed. The reason media are not commenting on the case is because charges have now been brought so any comments in the media could constitute contempt of court.

A well-felt collar is on its way, as he does his best to crash the forthcoming Rudakubana trial.


(Who on earth would want to undermine that, cause widespread outrage, pay Farridge to be on their telly boxes, and make DHL depots go bang in the middle of the night?)

Anyone with any sense knows exactly why there's a media blackout. Farage, not being stupid, knows this. He also knows exactly what he's doing and the question remains as to what his endgame might be. Whether it's a merger with the extreme wing of the Tories or an attempt to lead the political wing of Tommeh's streetfighting army, the fact remains that Farage is the most dangerous politician this country has seen since Oswald Mosley.

As James Ball points out this has the potential to be dangerous.




He also argues that contempt of court rules need reforming as thye don't stop people posting stuff online.