Page 35 of 52
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 11:57 am
by Andy McDandy
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 11:47 am
Apologies for the source.
Not particularly sure why the Home Office needs its own Remembrance Day service
A few years ago, November 11th landed on a Sunday. My employers at the time held a 2 minute silence on the Friday (9th) so people had an opportunity to remember with their work colleagues. Not joking.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 12:01 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 11:47 am
Apologies for the source.
Not particularly sure why the Home Office needs its own Remembrance Day service but anyway. I'm prepared to politicise for the greater good.
That's normal in government departments. I used to go to them in DfE.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 12:03 pm
by Oboogie
Abernathy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 10:06 am
Yes, the absurd old “(s)he’s only saying what most people are thinking” bollocks is so tired and so tedious. There was a total half-wit, regrettably Scottish, trotting it out again in respect of the hamster-faced fascist in the Question Time audience last night.
Amusingly, he was the only audience member prepared to speak up for her.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 12:06 pm
by Bones McCoy
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 12:34 pm
by RedSparrows
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 12:06 pm
Bang on. Children of Airfix is particularly good.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 1:22 pm
by Boiler
I’d hoped he’d fucked off, but no. From a BTL Guardian comment;
Stewart Jackson: “To my friends in the Cabinet. Your silence and refusal to support Suella Braverman is being noticed by the electorate”
The only thing the ‘electorate’ are noticing, Stu, is another shifting of decks on the Titanic, by your party leadership. Sit down, you fool.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 2:59 pm
by Crabcakes
It certainly is being noticed by the electorate. In the sense anyone choosing not to support her goes up a bit in my estimation of them.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:43 pm
by Andy McDandy
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -secretary
Out on the culture war battlefield, crack sniper Hyde, M. takes aim and hits....
Suella Braverman has undermined the operational independence of the police, angered politicians and communities on all sides in Northern Ireland, stoked the potential for unrest caused by the far right and antisemites at tomorrow’s pro-Palestinian march, earned a rebuke from Winston Churchill’s grandson, and so much more besides – and all out of sheer respect for the dead we commemorate this weekend and every Armistice Day.
Suella epitomises that most dead end of supposed modern political attributes: “annoying all the right people”. What sort of programme for improving people’s lives is that, when it’s at home?
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:52 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
This evidence of favourable treatment of leftists seems pretty weak. How many really big rightwing demonstrations are there? The only comparison I've seen was anti-lockdown protests. The arrests there were made under Covid laws, and people seemed to be pretty flagrant about breaking the laws from what I saw of those. So not really surprising lots of people got nicked. And it's much harder to arrest a bunch of fast moving younger people who run away than a bunch of people who stand there saying "Go on, arrest me!" and who in many cases are actively seeking martyrdom.
Republican demonstrators were arrested en masse and then let go without charge. Not really left-wing bias.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:54 pm
by mattomac
Remember that vigil?
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:31 pm
by Boiler
Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:43 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -secretary
Out on the culture war battlefield, crack sniper Hyde, M. takes aim and hits....
Suella Braverman has undermined the operational independence of the police, angered politicians and communities on all sides in Northern Ireland, stoked the potential for unrest caused by the far right and antisemites at tomorrow’s pro-Palestinian march, earned a rebuke from Winston Churchill’s grandson, and so much more besides – and all out of sheer respect for the dead we commemorate this weekend and every Armistice Day.
Suella epitomises that most dead end of supposed modern political attributes: “annoying all the right people”. What sort of programme for improving people’s lives is that, when it’s at home?
The comments are interesting - is this true?
If you want a measure of the inherent cruelty of Tory Ministers (I know - where to begin with the current destroyers of democracy, the economy and kindness to others!) it was PM Thatcher forbidding any injured Falkland veterans from taking part in the Victory parade.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:43 pm
by Andy McDandy
There's a reference to it in one of Sue Townsend's Adrian Mole books, which were vaguely contemporary.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:08 pm
by Oboogie
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:52 pm
This evidence of favourable treatment of leftists seems pretty weak. How many really big rightwing demonstrations are there?
EDL at their foamy peak (over 10 years ago) got 9,000 a couple of times, FLA never approached those numbers.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:12 pm
by Samanfur
Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 11:57 am
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 11:47 am
Apologies for the source.
Not particularly sure why the Home Office needs its own Remembrance Day service
A few years ago, November 11th landed on a Sunday. My employers at the time held a 2 minute silence on the Friday (9th) so people had an opportunity to remember with their work colleagues. Not joking.
There's an employer around here (not mine) doing the same - only with a three minute silence.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 6:50 pm
by satnav
Apparently Braverman's supporters are threatening to put in letters of no confidence in Rishi if he sacks her. I just saw this on Twitter.
So if he sacks her he is screwed and if he doesn't sack her he will forever be seen as weak. He will probably wimp out and try and get her to do a job swap with James Cleverly. Her diplomatic skills would play well with the Brexit brigade.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 6:57 pm
by Oboogie
He's only screwed if they get the numbers, they need about 50, I reckon they've got about 20ish at most.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:11 pm
by satnav
She only managed 27 votes in the leadership contest last year but I suppose backers of Mordaunt and Badenoch might jump on board if they think their candidate has a chance of claiming the top job is Sunak is ousted.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:19 pm
by davidjay
Even the biggest headbangers amongst them know they can't survive another change of leadership. They know they're fucked so they're running round picking up everything that isn't nailed down and their only interest is in taking it right to the wire. In this respect Sunak truly is one of them.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:37 pm
by Oboogie
There will be Tory MPs calculating that, if Sunak stays, they might retain their seat.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2023 8:15 pm
by Boiler
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2023 12:06 pm
Where was that from, Bones?