Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Sat May 14, 2022 8:56 pm
SWP were out in Lancaster today. We were eating lunch outside a pub, near their stall.
General response was that Johnson is a cunt, but give Corbyn a rest, he isn't coming back, and Starmer needs to stop fucking about andput the boot in.
This from students, tweedy country types, old and young, all sorts.
I increasingly get the impression that Corbyn is being ill served by his fanclub. Most people would probably by now have developed either a grudging respect or mild level of affection for him having forgotten the worst of his reign, were it not for the constant background whine from the usual suspects that he was actually the best thing ever and we’re a load of Tory bastards for not unquestioningly supporting his every decision, which in turn is a reminder of all the reasons why he is actually a man of selective morals, questionable intelligence and judgement, and a big fan of cronyism and nepotism.
He’ll never achieve elder statesman status because his own inability to reel in his most frothing acolytes means we now have constant reminders of how very fucking awful he was. Which is poetic justice I suppose.
Compare and contrast - Corbyn and Michael Foot. Admittedly, Corbyn isn't fit to be mentioned in the same breath either as a man, a Socialist or a politician, but both were disastrous leaders and were responsible for humiliating defeats. The difference is that Foot, as John Major put it, knew when to leave the stage and as a result gained respect from all sides and left an honourable legacy.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 9:24 pm
by Andy McDandy
We need Smiley, we got Haydon in charge with a bunch of Esterhases propping him up.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 5:54 pm
by Youngian
Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Mon May 16, 2022 9:24 pm
We need Smiley, we got Haydon in charge with a bunch of Esterhases propping him up.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 5:57 pm
by Youngian
Haven’t paid much attention to Assange supporters onTwitter before but had a run in with them today. What a rancid collection of screwballs, Kremlin sock puppets and halfwits.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 11:18 am
by Crabcakes
The argument seems to run that his org released some embarrassing stuff for the US, so he’s automatically a hero and we should just ignore all that awkward rape stuff and leaking things helpful for Trump and Putin and all that.
Usual selective/simplistic morals. He did something we like first = free pass on everything else, no matter how dubious and questionable.
See also: Corbyn, J.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 11:57 am
by davidjay
I may be wrong, but I get the impression that Assange started off doing the right thing, then became the darling of the Wicked West is Wrong Always element and began to believe his own publicity.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 12:01 pm
by Andy McDandy
Happens a lot. See Michael Moore, John Pilger, etc. Constant calls to do their greatest hit again and again, and meanwhile the people paying their bills want something in return too. Gets all a bit Ralph McTell:
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 3:12 pm
by davidjay
I think that with Michael Moore it's more that he can't help embellishing his case. A hundred irrefutable facts aren't enough, he has to add a couple of half-truths and as a result his entire film/book can be portrayed as fiction.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 6:02 pm
by Abernathy
Anybody follow “Another Angry Voice”, or “Another Angry Wank” as I can’t help calling him?
Like Squealer Jones, Tom Clark has a pathological hatred of the current leader of the Labour Party, Sir Keir Starmer, and has been writing screeds and screeds of frankly unhinged diatribes all but proclaiming Starmer to be the spawn of Satan himself. Almost none of what he writes is true, and it’s getting to the point where I’m beginning to think an intervention on mental health grounds might be the best thing for him right now. In his latest Facebook rant, he has pivoted slightly to get the exceptionally capable Wes Streeting (a “lamentable wax-faced mannequin”) in his sights. I believe he really does have a Jeremy Corbyn hot water bottle.
Abernathy wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 6:02 pm
Anybody follow “Another Angry Voice”, or “Another Angry Wank” as I can’t help calling him?
I think I read him once or twice many years ago and filed him under "tedious twat". It's like reading a version of "Anonymous" under Fenton's blogs. I thought he had a domain though and a website, not just a Facebook presence?
Edit: see he's also on Twitter, Instagram and Blogspot. Looks to be the same material sprayed everywhere.
Abernathy wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 6:02 pm
Anybody follow “Another Angry Voice”, or “Another Angry Wank” as I can’t help calling him?
Like Squealer Jones, Tom Clark has a pathological hatred of the current leader of the Labour Party, Sir Keir Starmer, and has been writing screeds and screeds of frankly unhinged diatribes all but proclaiming Starmer to be the spawn of Satan himself. Almost none of what he writes is true, and it’s getting to the point where I’m beginning to think an intervention on mental health grounds might be the best thing for him right now. In his latest Facebook rant, he has pivoted slightly to get the exceptionally capable Wes Streeting (a “lamentable wax-faced mannequin”) in his sights. I believe he really does have a Jeremy Corbyn hot water bottle.
I remember thinking he was ok around 2012-15 but he's positive proof that Corbynism rots the brain.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Sat May 21, 2022 7:47 pm
by mattomac
I remember getting tired of him over the Scottish referendum. People who use traitor are not people I generally take much attention especially after just voting
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2022 3:43 pm
by Nigredo
Making friends as usual.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 4:53 pm
by davidjay
Nobody celebrates failure quite like...
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 4:57 pm
by Nigredo
Curious he didn't reference 2019 where he supposedly "won the argument".
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 7:23 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Does anyone else commemorate lost elections? Did Ted Heath commemorate losing the February 1974 election (when he got more votes but fewer seats than Labour). "I was inspired by the Who Governs? campaign that I headed, and had I won by a street, we'd have solved in industrial relations in a much better way than Mrs Thatcher".
I'm still waiting to hear about this Brexit which (the EEA ruled out) wouldn't have dumped us in lots of the same slow growth shit we are in now.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2022 10:35 pm
by davidjay
2017 was an ideal result for the Jezzerati. Close enough to claim a moral victory and say they'd have done it if the Establishment hadn't been afraid of them, but not close enough to compromise their principles by winning.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2022 12:18 am
by Abernathy
Yes indeed. 2017- a general election fought against the worst and most inept Tory election campaign for generations, and which Corbyn’s Labour Party still lost, and badly at that. The Corbynite mythology that says Corbyn “nearly won” is of course, utter cobblers. Here’s a wee reminder of why :
Thanks for that Abers. I had wondered where the 2,227 figure came from but couldn't be arsed to check it. It is, of course, bollocks - as he says, the Jezzites plough the furrow that centre = right and eveyone who isn't them is a Tory ad nauseum, yet presumably they would all have fallen under the great man's spell.
Re: Continuity Jez
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2022 1:39 pm
by Nigredo
Abernathy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 12:18 am
Yes indeed. 2017- a general election fought against the worst and most inept Tory election campaign for generations, and which Corbyn’s Labour Party still lost, and badly at that. The Corbynite mythology that says Corbyn “nearly won” is of course, utter cobblers. Here’s a wee reminder of why :