Page 33 of 98

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:42 am
by Crabcakes
Apparently Wakeford defecting has made some of the Tories so annoyed, they're going to prop up Johnson out of spite.

Marvellous. If nothing else, the defection might have prevented an earlier ousting and allowed for things to get even worse for them :smile:

EDIT: Wakeford, not Wakefield. FFS!

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:20 pm
by Nigredo
From an unknown Twitterati:
Labour working hard to throw a protective arm around defector Christian Wakeford, including finding him a new Commons office. When asked who his current office neighbour is, Wakeford said 'Richard Burgon'. To which a Labour wag replied: "We'll definitely find you a new office."

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 4:49 pm
by Nigredo
From a known Twitterati:


Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 5:08 pm
by Cyclist
At this rate Labour are going to end up with a majority in the House without the bother of a GE. :lol:

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:52 pm
by davidjay
Crabcakes wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:42 am Apparently Wakeford defecting has made some of the Corbynistas so annoyed, they're going to prop up Johnson out of spite.

Marvellous. If nothing else, the defection might have prevented an earlier ousting and allowed for things to get even worse for them :smile:

EDIT: Wakeford, not Wakefield. FFS!
Fixed.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 7:49 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Jess Bernard isn't happy.

https://metro.co.uk/2022/01/25/as-a-lab ... XTnqwrCFI4
Despite his record and suspicion of his motivations – which he says were a result of Boris Johnson and the Tory Party being incapable of offering the leadership the country deserves – Wakeford was welcomed by Keir Starmer and many other Labour MPs with open arms.

Labour’s newest MP reportedly met personally with Starmer on Monday, a luxury that serving MP Zarah Sultana says she has never had.

It feels like we the membership and our preferred representatives are being sidelined and our voices silenced.
While the leadership celebrated and it made the Tories look a little silly, thousands of Labour members were devastated that someone who has spent at least a decade in favour of harmful policies – such as abstaining on a vote to cancel cuts to Universal Credit and voting to allow water companies to dump sewage into rivers and seas – would be gifted a Labour membership and national platform.

It emerged that Wakeford had spent his time insulting Labour members allegedly referring to us as a ‘bunch of c***s’ in his Conservative WhatsApp chats.
My Dad said to me only in the Labour Party could people look a gift horse in the mouth and decide to stick their head up their arse.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:29 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Why would Starmer want to debrief an MP who'd just come across from the Tories? It's a proper mystery.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:32 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Howard does actuarial science.


Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:43 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:29 pm Why would Starmer want to debrief an MP who'd just come across from the Tories? It's a proper mystery.
He should instead be having a one to one meeting with Zarah Sultana.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:56 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
How many MPs get personal meetings with the leader? Have any of the MPs they don't like had one?

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 3:32 pm
by BBN
What is it about anyone who puts anything on Twitter who isn't in a position of extreme power putting "now" at the end of their tweet who sounds like a fucking toddler?

What do they think it'll achieve? "Ooh well we were going to consider it for inclusion in the manifesto then introduce legislation which would mean maybe in around 5 years time it would work, but Howard Beckett has tweeted so we must do it without any of those things."

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:11 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Laura Pidcock has reportedly resigned from the NEC.

Excellent.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:25 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Labour are "devoid of ideas", apparently. Like "here's some free stuff, paid for by someone else".

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:40 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 7:25 pm Labour are "devoid of ideas", apparently. Like "here's some free stuff, paid for by someone else".
Or stuff they've borrowed off Bernie Sanders.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:47 pm
by Boiler
Is this why "Starmer Out" is trending on Twitter ATM?

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:15 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The Weeping Angel wrote: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:40 pm
Or stuff they've borrowed off Bernie Sanders.
They could do worse, to be honest.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:50 am
by mattomac
Don’t lie Rebecca Long Bailey worked 24 hours for several weeks to write that manifesto.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:15 am
by Crabcakes
mattomac wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:50 am Don’t lie Rebecca Long Bailey worked 24 hours for several weeks to write that manifesto.
Yes, but it was 24 non-consecutive hours spread over those weeks 😁

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:26 pm
by davidjay
Dave Nellist's standing in the Erdington bye-election for the TUSC.

Re: Labour, generally.

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 1:32 pm
by Andy McDandy
Dave Nellist's still alive?

Next you'll be telling me Alan Towers is back on Midlands Today.