Page 33 of 33

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:43 am
by Crabcakes
Abernathy wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:36 am A pedant writes : Sumption, not Sumpter.
Fixed it. Bizarre autocorrect picking one non-word over another!

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:45 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The Guardian/ Observer has been all over the place on trans rights. I suppose they're overdue an article like this to balance Sodha and all, but this really isn't very good.


Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:53 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:32 am Can you explain that? Once again I have no idea what you mean. And it’s getting tedious.
It's a reference to Ocado's slogan of there's an Ocado just for you. You could have just googled it you know.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:10 pm
by The Weeping Angel
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:45 pm The Guardian/ Observer has been all over the place on trans rights. I suppose they're overdue an article like this to balance Sodha and all, but this really isn't very good.

Well I'm not shocked to see Jolyon Maugham make an arguement that is legally illiterate.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 7:31 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:53 pm
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:32 am Can you explain that? Once again I have no idea what you mean. And it’s getting tedious.
It's a reference to Ocado's slogan of there's an Ocado just for you. You could have just googled it you know.
You could have broken the habit of a lifetime and included some context in your posts.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:01 pm
by kreuzberger
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:53 pm You could have just googled it you know.
Tried that. Drivel, apparently.


Screenshot 2025-04-19 at 20.59.26.png
Screenshot 2025-04-19 at 20.59.26.png (271.42 KiB) Viewed 72 times

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:08 pm
by satnav
I see that Father Ted writer Graham Linehan has been all over the media today claiming that Thursday's judgement could help him relaunch his comedy career. I think he is being very optimistic.

The way he has behaved over the last 5 years has burnt a lot of bridges. Whilst everybody is entitled to an opinion on the gender identity issue the way he tried to put his opinion across was extremely unacceptable. He stalked and harassed people who disagreed with him and he became so obsessed wit the issue he let it break up his marriage.

He was supposed to be working on 'Father Ted' the musical. But I would be very surprised if he could actually attract enough investors to back such a project. If he can't attract big name stars to work with him any musical would be extremely difficult to get off of the ground.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:10 pm
by The Weeping Angel
kreuzberger wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:01 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:53 pm You could have just googled it you know.
Tried that. Drivel, apparently.



Screenshot 2025-04-19 at 20.59.26.png
It was a FUCKING play on their slogan.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:11 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
It was a FUCKING waste of time.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:20 pm
by The Weeping Angel
So's talking to you but i do it anyway.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:30 pm
by kreuzberger
I think that it was a fair point to suggest that you break out from pidgin-Yoda, every once in a while. Your utterances are demonstrably ungooglable.

Re: The Gender Identity Issue.

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:36 pm
by The Weeping Angel
0121 Do One. Oh and since I'm supposed to provide context with my posts from now on that's brummie slang.