Page 31 of 52
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 7:48 pm
by davidjay
Watchman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:47 pm
satnav wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:18 pm
I'd loved to know why the police were involved in ejecting the heckler from the hall. He had a legitimate pass to be in the conference hall and he wasn't breaking any laws. This was way over the top but it seems in keeping with how they have been policing protests outside of the conference centre.
Must admit, I got the sense of some set up, didn't seem "quite right"
In 1981 a couple of Right to Work protesters got in and started heckling the Evil Witch. Fair does, she responded with a couple of (almost certainly scripted) jokes and came out of it well. Not so Braverman.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:13 pm
by kreuzberger
She actually railed against "diversity, equity and inclusion"?
She's as stupid as she is rotten.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:16 pm
by Boiler
Classic ladder-puller.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:50 pm
by Youngian
Watchman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:47 pm
satnav wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:18 pm
I'd loved to know why the police were involved in ejecting the heckler from the hall. He had a legitimate pass to be in the conference hall and he wasn't breaking any laws. This was way over the top but it seems in keeping with how they have been policing protests outside of the conference centre.
Must admit, I got the sense of some set up, didn't seem "quite right"
The PC arriving on cue after Boff’s barely audible heckle does look like he warned about his intervention in advance. Perhaps he fancies being the liberal gay Tory rebel mayoral candidate when Susan Hall is dumped. Boff is a prize pratt, anyway.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:00 pm
by mattomac
Doesn’t seem they like free speech too much.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:27 am
by Andy McDandy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rence.html
She's not going to shag you, Qunt.
Actually, she might. You're made for each other.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:46 am
by Boiler
Considerable amount of sick came up there...
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 9:37 am
by Watchman
Andy McDandy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:27 am
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... rence.html
She's not going to shag you, Qunt.
Actually, she might. You're made for each other.
I must admit, I got him down as still being in the wardrobe
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:03 am
by Bones McCoy
Her last speech (From the soundbyte) "We were the gentle wave, but modern migration is the hurricane".
She's now playing Michael Bates' Rangi Ram from It ain't half hot mum.
"We British" Vs "You Bladdy Coolies".
I really hope the younger generation will turn out and vote this time.
Deliver the mother of all landslides.
Show this lot that you can't have first Nuremburg without second Nuremburg.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:14 am
by Abernathy
Then the Home Secretary herself was in our midst, loping towards the lectern in dove-grey power suit and nude shoes, hair cascading over her shoulders.
Nude shoes, eh ? Phoawarrrurrrghhh!
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:19 am
by RedSparrows
I am not touching that Letts article with a bargepole, but would I be right in thinking it's framed as a 'brave' and 'provocative' speech, railing against 'metropolitan smugness' by 'speaking truth'?
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:20 am
by Andy McDandy
Care to guess this week's lottery numbers, Red?
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:23 am
by Abernathy
RedSparrows wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:19 am
I am not touching that Letts article with a bargepole, but would I be right in thinking it's framed as a 'brave' and 'provocative' speech, railing against 'metropolitan smugness' by 'speaking truth'?
"properly spellbinding, dramatically assured", and erm, "wig-lifting".
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:47 am
by Bones McCoy
Abernathy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:23 am
RedSparrows wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:19 am
I am not touching that Letts article with a bargepole, but would I be right in thinking it's framed as a 'brave' and 'provocative' speech, railing against 'metropolitan smugness' by 'speaking truth'?
"properly spellbinding, dramatically assured", and erm, "wig-lifting".
Yeah, but did the handful of geriatric freikorpsers in the audience stir from their slumber.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:18 pm
by Crabcakes
Abernathy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:14 am
Then the Home Secretary herself was in our midst, loping towards the lectern in dove-grey power suit and nude shoes, hair cascading over her shoulders.
Nude shoes, eh ? Phoawarrrurrrghhh!
Subtle bit of lazy racism there too by the reliably cowardly Qunt. 'Nude' for Braverman would not be the same as for, say - Truss or Thatcher.
Gotta appeal to all the bases, and all that.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 8:49 am
by Yug
Even her own paramilitary forces have had enough of her
Senior police officers have told i they are “sick” of the Government pushing them to “reach beyond the law” to arrest protesters for “political gain” following a row over a pro-Palestinian rally.
A senior Met officer told i that those within the force were frustrated with Home Secretary Suella Braverman after she criticised them for failing to arrest protesters chanting “jihad” in London over the weekend.
Another senior policing source accused Ms Braverman of making the job of policing even harder and said that politicians should not be involved in operational matters...
https://inews.co.uk/news/met-police-sue ... st-2705340
I can think of several other governments which took direct political control of their police forces, and none of them I'd like to see replicated in the UK.
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 8:52 am
by Watchman
Well it was ok for Maggie,
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 10:38 am
by Bones McCoy
Watchman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 8:52 am
Well it was ok for Maggie,
Until the truth came out.

Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:40 am
by Watchman
Good point,must admit my first point of reference was the miners strike
Re: Suella Braverman
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 2:09 pm
by Bones McCoy
Watchman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:40 am
Good point,must admit my first point of reference was the miners strike
In my mind, the government's response to Hillsborough was a side effect of the Miner's strike.
They'd divided the plebs into "for us or against us".
Plucky South Yorkshire Coppers - with their recent Orgreave battle honours -had to be protected.
Orrible football fans, esp from Liverpool - Expendables. Or for the real nasties "Had it coming".