Page 30 of 52

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:36 pm
by Andy McDandy
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Fri Sep 29, 2023 2:49 pm
Why?

She is a religious fanatic and part of a sect that has long ago parted company with the basic tenets of the Buddhist philosophy. Better not to trivialise it, it is dangerous.

See here:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/ ... rk-secrets
Wow. Comes across as Jim Jones meets Himmler's Thule group meets the Luskentyrian cult from Iain Banks's Whit.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:37 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Exactly.

Hence my earlier comment.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 6:43 pm
by Youngian
He reinvented himself as the MP for Wokingham espousing Brexit cultism

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 8:32 pm
by RandomElement
Boiler wrote: Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:31 pm Well done Sue Ellen, you've got the support you crave.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... tervention

Mark Collett, a former protege of the BNP leader Nick Griffin who now leads the Patriotic Alternative group, was among those to endorse Braverman’s address.

“Suella Braverman has basically admitted multiculturalism has failed and that mass immigration is a threat to the west,” he wrote in a Facebook post. “This is a good thing. Now I know that many nationalists will complain that this is just a pre-election stunt and that it is nothing more than a desperate attempt to win back voters. I don’t know whether that is entirely true. What I do know, is that what she said is a good thing for nationalism.”
Analysis by Hope Not Hate also claimed that Braverman’s speech contained echoes of the “Great Replacement Theory” – the premise that white Americans and Europeans are being actively “replaced” by non-white immigrants. Braverman said that “more than one in five births are to foreign-born mothers”.
Is it wrong for me to wish ill upon this poisonous, hamster-faced creature?
I have seen a photoshopped image of Braverman staggering ashore as a boat migrant. That is what I'd like to happen to her. For her to experience what she is inflicting on others.


I spent a good 20 minutes or so looking for the image, but I couldn't find it. I looked through a lot of Cold War Steve's work, but I couldn't find it there. So it may be someone else. but I failed at Googling

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 8:39 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
I would like her, in one of her deep meditation sessions, to achieve genuine awareness of her own hideousness. Karma will take care of the rest.

That's the answer that she, if she were genuinely a Buddhist, would give...

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2023 5:09 pm
by davidjay
When you're to the right of Pritti Patel...


Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2023 5:23 pm
by Yug
Long may they continue to fight each other in public. It's not doing what's left of their image* many favours.

*Them personally, and the stinking cesspool of a Party they belong to.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 3:57 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The luxury beliefs brigade sit in their ivory towers telling ordinary people that they are morally deficient because they dare to get upset about the impact of illegal migration, net zero, or habitual criminals.

And you can be sure of one thing.

People with luxury beliefs will flock to Labour at the next election because that’s the way to get the kind of society they want.
A statement from the not at all powerful Home Secretary here, who has no policy responsibility for stuff "ordinary people" are unhappy about.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:01 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The British people have no enthusiasm for Keir Starmer.

They know that he believes in nothing …

That he will say anything to anyone … And then change his mind at the first sign of trouble.

Keir Starmer lacks the force of personality to lead this country effectively.

Imagine what would happen if he became Prime Minister.

Luxury beliefs would reign supreme.

Britain would go properly woke.
General Election then, Suella?

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:18 pm
by Crabcakes
Braverman there, making a solid pitch for taking over as leader. Specifically, leader of the National Front.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:23 pm
by Tubby Isaacs

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:30 pm
by Andy McDandy
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 3:57 pm
The luxury beliefs brigade sit in their ivory towers telling ordinary people that they are morally deficient because they dare to get upset about the impact of illegal migration, net zero, or habitual criminals.

And you can be sure of one thing.

People with luxury beliefs will flock to Labour at the next election because that’s the way to get the kind of society they want.
A statement from the not at all powerful Home Secretary here, who has no policy responsibility for stuff "ordinary people" are unhappy about.
So, to get a society where everyone can afford "luxury beliefs", AKA being a decent human being, in which people are treated with respect instead of being endlessly played off against eachother,. I need to vote Labour? Right, got it.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:38 pm
by Youngian
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:01 pm
The British people have no enthusiasm for Keir Starmer.

They know that he believes in nothing …

That he will say anything to anyone … And then change his mind at the first sign of trouble.

Keir Starmer lacks the force of personality to lead this country effectively.

Imagine what would happen if he became Prime Minister.

Luxury beliefs would reign supreme.

Britain would go properly woke.
General Election then, Suella?
Man with no beliefs has luxury beliefs and woke beliefs. Now I’m lost.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:42 pm
by Andy McDandy
Also, "luxury" kind of contradicts this land of milk and honey, sunlit uplands, isn't everything just great narrative.

It really is king of the shit heap stuff.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:44 pm
by Yug
I was going to say it's all meaningless bollocks. But then I thought "nah. You already know that".

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:18 pm
by satnav
I'd loved to know why the police were involved in ejecting the heckler from the hall. He had a legitimate pass to be in the conference hall and he wasn't breaking any laws. This was way over the top but it seems in keeping with how they have been policing protests outside of the conference centre.

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:30 pm
by Crabcakes
Apparently, after her speech, Braverman went outside and stood on a guide dog.

This isn’t a joke!

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:47 pm
by Watchman
satnav wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:18 pm I'd loved to know why the police were involved in ejecting the heckler from the hall. He had a legitimate pass to be in the conference hall and he wasn't breaking any laws. This was way over the top but it seems in keeping with how they have been policing protests outside of the conference centre.
Must admit, I got the sense of some set up, didn't seem "quite right"

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:48 pm
by Watchman
Crabcakes wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:30 pm Apparently, after her speech, Braverman went outside and stood on a guide dog.

This isn’t a joke!
More like the guide dog's owner

Re: Suella Braverman

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 7:03 pm
by Bones McCoy
Crabcakes wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:30 pm Apparently, after her speech, Braverman went outside and stood on a guide dog.

This isn’t a joke!
Guidedogs are woke.

Blind people need to exercise a bit of self reliance and try a bit harder at seeing.