Page 29 of 148
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:27 pm
by Youngian
Sunak’s not getting the hang of this. Whether Zahawi now goes or stays, the PM will still look a tit not in charge. The decisive leader moment has passed. Hiding behind a drawn out report didn’t work for Johnson and won’t to cover the arse of a tax swindler.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:12 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Sunak’s example of how he wasn’t weak was that he resigned from a job with Bozo.
Keep making that point, I say, Rishi. Lots of your voters like Bozo more than you. Sounds like an easy route to Tory voters staying at home.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 3:04 pm
by davidjay
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:15 pm
Oh FFS.
Ricky Sunshine eclipsed at PMQs so he pulls out the Corbyn card - whereas he, a man of principle, resigned over Johnson. After how many years?
Corbyn may be many things, but he's never been accused of lawbreaking or blatantly lied to Parliament.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 3:08 pm
by mattomac
He’s just really crap.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 3:21 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The Angel Delight Prime Minister.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 3:24 pm
by Andy McDandy
In tribute to Alexei Sayle, I'll throw in the K-Tel Conservative.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 5:04 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Job too big for Sunak, says Warwick Davis.
He hasn't, but he should.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:21 pm
by Bones McCoy
It can't be long before the launch of
(Wait for it)
Operation Save Wee Dug.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:20 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:21 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Send for Frosty!
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:24 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 10:48 am
by Crabcakes
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:12 pm
Sunak’s example of how he wasn’t weak was that he resigned from a job with Bozo.
I’m bewildered as to why he thinks people would be impressed at someone discovering their ‘morals’ at the last possible second, and even then only resigning when it was clear colleagues were doing so en masse and in a manner that was structured around taking the top job for yourself (which he then spectacularly failed to do).
He has all the leadership skills of a third choice caretaker manager looking after a knackered, gutted team that already know they’re up for relegation.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 9:29 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
How are the polls? Um, moving in the right direction, Prime Minister.
That SNP figure, doubtless based on a small subsample, is very clearly wrong.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 11:58 pm
by Youngian
Crabcakes wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 10:48 am
He has all the leadership skills of a third choice caretaker manager looking after a knackered, gutted team that already know they’re up for relegation.
Sunak’s never going to appear in a heartwarming Brit comedy other than the poncey southern banker come to take the ground.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 1:39 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 1:44 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
I think the Ben Walker scenario is likely much closer to reality than the big numbers that have been bandied about. I'm surprised to see that it could be even lower with tactical voting.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 2:00 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 1:44 pm
I think the Ben Walker scenario is likely much closer to reality than the big numbers that have been bandied about. I'm surprised to see that it could be even lower with tactical voting.
Eh?
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 2:00 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:21 pm
It can't be long before the launch of
(Wait for it)
Operation Save Wee Dug.
To be known, hereafter, as the Yuppie Puppy...
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 2:41 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 2:00 pm
Tubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 1:44 pm
I think the Ben Walker scenario is likely much closer to reality than the big numbers that have been bandied about. I'm surprised to see that it could be even lower with tactical voting.
Eh?
The big numbers about Labour needing a 13% lead or whatever. I think Ben Walker's 7 percent is more plausible, though I wouldn't expect that to go lower with tactical voting.
Re: Lightweight Rishi
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:05 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Do you mean Ben Walker at The Statesman? If so, what has he said? (or ref for article)