:sunglasses: 40.6 % :pray: 8.5 % :laughing: 30.2 % 🧥 4.7 % :cry: 12.3 % :🤗 3.8 %
#77426
It's hard to see this as anything but the TV version of clickbait.

How surprising for C4...
mattomac liked this
#77430
mattomac wrote:Speaking of which he is on the Channel 4 election coverage of the US elections which I see as a bit pointless.

A) he has no expertise
B) No one is getting a result for 2-3 days
What? I thought he was supposed to be working for GB News, or wasn't there enough mulah left in the kitty after shelling out a hundred grand a month for another grifter?
mattomac, Malcolm Armsteen, Watchman and 1 others liked this
#77433
And the demographic the advertisers are interested in.
#77435
I think you need to remember that C4's original founding mission statement was that it should strive to be different.

I sometimes think that, as with this, it self-consciously goes a little bit too far in trying to meet that mission.
#77474
Man's a lush.

And a cunt.
#77494
Youngian wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2024 11:03 pm I’ll certainly ignore Dan’s critique. When has Johnson’s flippant hackery ever shown insight?
He hasn’t even read it - the giveaway is he swaps from ‘settling down with it’ to the sort of language you’d use once finished.

Though to be fair, I suspect Johnson hasn’t read it either.
  • 1
  • 272
  • 273
  • 274
  • 275
  • 276
  • 279
Over in America...

Just what the world needs. https://www.bbc.co.uk/[…]

The Liberal Democrats, generally

Their plan is to slap tariffs on teslas.

Labour Government 2024 - ?

Never heard of that till you made me look it up. R[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

This is a massive election, for the Supreme Court […]