Mailwatch(ed) Forum

Dan Wootton gives his deluded views on Johnson's performance.

Westminster’s crooked kangaroo court tried its hardest, but failed to produce any smoking gun against Boris Johnson. This deranged witch hunt must now fail for the sake of British democracy

The committee didn't need a smoking gun, they have already concluded that he mislead parliament. This was actually Johnson's opportunity to produce a smoking gun to try and clear his name.

I think the committee clearly put to bed any idea that it was a kangaroo court when it was put to Johnson that no Tory MPs raised any objection to the committee scrutinizing him or how the committee would operate.

Faithful, yea unto the end.

It's just a wage for Wootton, this dentally luxurious gobshite from the antipodes.

His job is to undermine everything and anything that doesn't match the daily deluge of memos and missives. It pays the school fees and his dentist.

Doesn’t look like he’s earning his wage if 60% of his looney viewers don’t buy Johnson’s bullshit. Despite eight guests to back Wooton up

It's heartening to see how many people who I'd have thought would support him have been critical.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... -name.html

Out of the starting blocks with the "oh go on, it's a nice day and the sun is shining" defence, it's Sarah Vine. Fair to say she's not winning the crowd over.

If you want a chuckle here's ConservativeHome curating their vary-own stab in the back myth.

https://conservativehome.com/2023/03/23 ... t-justice/

We now move to the final refuge of a scoudrel's sidekicks.

He can't have misled parliament because no MP would be stupid enough to believe what he said.

Or similar.

Galloping Ganesa - how many ways can you unpick that in a minute?

Government’s favourite news channel

I will never understand how people grow up to be such mendacious pricks. Never. Absolute toss, born of an utter contempt for anything virtuous. I just don't get it.

He's a shit.

Fuck 'im.

What they call deep state is what others would call parliamentary sovereignty. All they believe is that their side should have licence to do whatever they like.

It would seem Rees-Mogg’s “Boris won in the court of public opinion” is now vying with Jezza’s “we won the argument” for most disconnected from reality take on a recent event.

31% trust Johnson to tell the truth? Effin eck

Youngian wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 7:59 pm 31% trust Johnson to tell the truth? Effin eck

The "don't knows" have not been reported.

Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 8:29 pm

Youngian wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 7:59 pm 31% trust Johnson to tell the truth? Effin eck

The "don't knows" have not been reported.

There's still a lot of Brexiteers indulging in copium.

Bones McCoy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 8:29 pm

Youngian wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 7:59 pm 31% trust Johnson to tell the truth? Effin eck

The "don't knows" have not been reported.

Not even knowing whether Johnson is a liar is nothing to shout about.

The only Tories backing Johnson now are the head bangers. He is starting to look like John Redwood when he attempted to become Tory leader in the days of John Major. People took one look at the state of his backers and realised that electing him would be a total disaster.

I still don’t know who the balding chap between Redwood and Lamont is. I presume he was part of the Redwood A team given his prominence.