Page 226 of 277
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 4:14 pm
by Watchman
Re the Tory poster and the ships, I thought it was the Bibby Stockholm
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 7:04 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 7:28 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
He's sorry, so that's OK.
William Wragg is sorry, so that's OK.
I must try that if I'm ever arrested.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 7:28 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Forgot to mention; the man's a cunt.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:07 pm
by Abernathy
And that racist donor cunt Frank Hester was (allegedly) sorry, so that’s okay too.

Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:21 pm
by Youngian
We can safely say that if ‘courageous’ William Wragg was a Labour MP he wouldn’t be fourth or fifth on most news outlets’ running order
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:34 pm
by Andy McDandy
Look at the Fabricunt tweet and skim read it. Lots of buzzwords there:
Labour
Hamas
Proscribed
Terrorist
Dale Vince
And that absolute cunt move, "I am very pleased to hear this". One could glance at it and be forgiven for thinking that Fabricunt had been proved right.
Stupid haired pisshead cunt.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:46 pm
by Crabcakes
Latest YouGov has reform and the Tories within margin of error territory.
I can see why Sunak might be increasingly tempted to make a bolt for California, because this is going to be carnage.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:22 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:48 pm
by davidjay
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:22 pm
Running shoes on...
Every poll seems to be an outlier these days.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 12:17 am
by Bones McCoy
I notice a few commentators drawing lines between Wragg's confessions and Tyce's latest threats to Gullis.
If you believe the two are related, that entirely a matter for you.
I couldn't possibly comment.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 12:44 am
by Bones McCoy
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 4:08 pm
by Bones McCoy
Wragg and Bone.
Just rolls off the tongue.
It's going to be a tough election for Sunak to defend his premiership.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:45 pm
by satnav
Because William Wragg is the MP for Stockport the Manchester Evening News did an article about the story. At one point they mention that Leicestershire Police were looking into the case because a local MP had made a complaint. Quick as a flash Andrew Bridgen felt that he need to make a clarification.
Andrew Bridgen, the Independent MP for North West Leicestershire, stated he wasn't behind the report.
The article goes on to say.
He expressed his confusion over the mindset of those who send unsolicited explicit images, saying, "I am baffled by anyone who thinks that it is a good idea to send pictures of your genitalia to people you barely know,".
I'm really not sure why Bridgen felt it was so important get in his clarification quite so quickly. Were people really thinking Bridgen had been sending dick pics?
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:47 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
I just vomited.
Please give trigger warnings if you are going to describe such horrors...
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2024 1:25 am
by Oboogie
I didn't vomit, but I did emit a little groan at the use of the phrase "quick as a flash" in a post about dick pics.

Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2024 1:50 am
by Bones McCoy
satnav wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:45 pm
Because William Wragg is the MP for Stockport the Manchester Evening News did an article about the story. At one point they mention that Leicestershire Police were looking into the case because a local MP had made a complaint. Quick as a flash Andrew Bridgen felt that he need to make a clarification.
Andrew Bridgen, the Independent MP for North West Leicestershire, stated he wasn't behind the report.
The article goes on to say.
He expressed his confusion over the mindset of those who send unsolicited explicit images, saying, "I am baffled by anyone who thinks that it is a good idea to send pictures of your genitalia to people you barely know,".
I'm really not sure why Bridgen felt it was so important get in his clarification quite so quickly. Were people really thinking Bridgen had been sending dick pics?
In Bridgen's case, a head and shoulders shot's a dick pick.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2024 6:00 pm
by Youngian
Is there anything in this story that rings true? Top talent like David Campbell-Bannerman are being passed over for PPC selection for One Nation Remoaners.
Tories accused of purging ‘high quality’ candidates who back Brexit
Those on the Tory right believe Downing Street is blocking “true blue” candidates who support low-tax and small-state conservatism from standing in the election so that the party will instead be dominated by centrists.
Some Tory MPs have said high-quality applicants for the list of approved parliamentary candidates are being rejected due to their traditional Conservative values, while those who might lack the required skills to be an MP are being put through because they believe in high taxation and public spending.
Former Conservative MEP David Campbell Bannerman said he is being blocked from progressing to the long list for any particular seat, after being on the approved list of candidates since 2019
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 24379.html
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2024 6:23 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Amazing that bloke who pisses his party about might not be welcome as an MP.
Re: Conservatives Generally
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2024 8:29 pm
by satnav
Isn't David Camper Bannerman chairman of the Conservative Democratic Organisation which looks very much like a party within a party? He has also spent much of the last 18 months arguing to get Boris Johnson back as leader so I can't imagine that Sunak has got much time for him.