:laughing: 100 %
User avatar
By Tubby Isaacs
#65866
Crabcakes wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2024 11:57 am
It kind of will, because they’re relying on more people seeing the investigated headlines and assuming there’s no smoke without fire than seeing any subsequent statement that there was no case to answer - and further that if there is *any* suggestion of an error, no matter how minor or unintentional, this will be amplified relentlessly.
That didn't work with Beergate though, did it?

It's also on a theme that reminds people of the likes of Zahawi.
User avatar
By Andy McDandy
#65871
When you're constantly introduced as "tax dodge slur minister...", it might well stick that something's not right. And that's all they want.

TBH she could produce all the evidence exonerating her that she could and it wouldn't make any difference. We're into "prove to my satisfaction..." territory.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#65876
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2024 11:29 am Won't be if nothing happens.
You know how it works.

Accusation on the front page.
Retraction bottom of Page 19

What message does the gammon go away with?

Basic stuff.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#65889
It's still being referenced on Twitter...
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#65904
It was their deputy chairman who started the latest allegations!
User avatar
By Crabcakes
#65907
A question, as I don’t know if this is correct or not - I’ve seen a post suggesting that the purpose of dragging this out and demanding the investigation is restarted is that, while the investigation is ongoing, Rayner can’t campaign (or at least will need to keep a much lower profile). Is this true?
Maintenant en France

The law is the law in France. In Türkiye, it […]

Labour Government 2024 - ?

I know a lot of EV owners are pretty cross at hav[…]

The Guardian

Adrian Chiles takes kitchen roll reviews to task. […]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

Actually Chinese State Media seem to be massively […]