By Oboogie
#81687
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:03 pm Put out a statement condeming Musk in no uncertain terms and making it clear he cannot dictate to this country. Call on MPs across the spectrum to call this out and make it clear we will take action against X if he persists.
Obviously you're not going to get support across the spectrum, there are plenty on Right and Left who are in full support of Musk. But even if such a statement did have universal support what do you hope that will achieve?
By Oboogie
#81692
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:33 pm I'm not sure who on the left supports Musk but something more forceful than Streeting's offer to work with him.
You're on Twitter, take a look. Jess Phillips is a hate figure for the Corbynistas - she threatened to murder Jeremy, she racially abused Diane Abbott, she's a War Criminal, a Tory and an Islamophobe...hell she's almost as evil as Starmer. Some of them would be celebrating openly if somebody stabbed her.
NevTheSweeper liked this
By davidjay
#81715
Oboogie wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 10:37 pm
The Weeping Angel wrote: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:33 pm I'm not sure who on the left supports Musk but something more forceful than Streeting's offer to work with him.
You're on Twitter, take a look. Jess Phillips is a hate figure for the Corbynistas - she threatened to murder Jeremy, she racially abused Diane Abbott, she's a War Criminal, a Tory and an Islamophobe...hell she's almost as evil as Starmer. Some of them would be celebrating openly if somebody stabbed her.
As we've seen on here before, there's no-one - Musk, Trump, Farage, Pol Pot - who the Cult of St Jeremy wouldn't support against Labour politicians who win elections.
Oboogie liked this
User avatar
By The Weeping Angel
#81723
Good idea here on how to take a stand against Musk.

https://takes.jamesomalley.co.uk/p/odds ... eird-thing
[T]here is an obvious thing that government could do now and that requires no legislation and costs no money: government could simply shift all the material it currently puts out on X to another platform or platforms (BlueSky and Mastodon being the obvious contenders, neither being under the control of a Silicon Valley billionaire1). That would in turn encourage all the users of X who currently use X to monitor government activity (journalists, businesses, many ordinary citizens) to open and use accounts on those competing platforms. That effect would be magnified if Labour MPs - and indeed all MPs and other public figures concerned about X’s conduct - did the same: and if government gave a lead, no doubt many others would follow.
User avatar
By Abernathy
#81728
Malcolm Armsteen wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:07 pm Mastodon?
It’s another alternative to TwitterX. Not quite as good as Blue Sky. Local and regionally based servers feeding into a wider (inter)national network. But also not the open sewer that TwitterX is.
User avatar
By Malcolm Armsteen
#81729
I know what it is, I was expressing surprise that anyone posts there any more!
mattomac liked this
By davidjay
#81737
The Weeping Angel wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 5:57 pm Good idea here on how to take a stand against Musk.

https://takes.jamesomalley.co.uk/p/odds ... eird-thing
[T]here is an obvious thing that government could do now and that requires no legislation and costs no money: government could simply shift all the material it currently puts out on X to another platform or platforms (BlueSky and Mastodon being the obvious contenders, neither being under the control of a Silicon Valley billionaire1). That would in turn encourage all the users of X who currently use X to monitor government activity (journalists, businesses, many ordinary citizens) to open and use accounts on those competing platforms. That effect would be magnified if Labour MPs - and indeed all MPs and other public figures concerned about X’s conduct - did the same: and if government gave a lead, no doubt many others would follow.
Normally I wouldn't want the fash to go unchallenged on any platform but in the same way the government doesn't post on Stormfront they shouldn't bother with Twitter either.
By RedSparrows
#81745
kreuzberger wrote: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:51 pm It's shite and nonsensically complicated. Unlike bsky, which is just a wee bit worthy and a bigger bit dull.
Lord BlueSky is worthy. I appreciate it being a place free of Blue tick mentalists, but it could do with a little less attention farming banality.

I suppose that's social media, though, once you get past (!) the vile.
The Guardian

Adrian Chiles takes kitchen roll reviews to task[…]

Conservatives Generally

Ha ha ha ha. Tories claim No 10 admission UK won[…]

Trump 2.0 Lunacy

'Kinell, Trump has managed to get those three[…]

Maintenant en France

The law is the law in France. In Türkiye, it […]