Page 3 of 12

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 6:39 pm
by Boiler
Word salad surgery

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 6:41 pm
by Boiler
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun May 23, 2021 6:22 pm Yeah, I know. I meant that I expect the BBC agreed to carry on funding it as part of a deal with the government.
That's my understanding of it, but I'm happy to be corrected.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 7:21 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Boiler wrote: Sun May 23, 2021 6:39 pmWord salad surgery
I'm old enough to remember when the Tories attacked John Prescott for his syntax (while there was rarely any doubt what he meant).

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 8:21 pm
by Andy McDandy
Compared to the Tory front bench, Prescott is Mark Anthony.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 9:57 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
That sounds like a 'standard lines' briefing, garbled by someone who didn't understand it.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 10:02 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
It's not even that. It's like somebody playing Just A Minute.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 10:09 pm
by Andy McDandy
Run down the clock, get out alive, don't wank on screen, chalk it up as a success.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 10:10 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Tubby Isaacs wrote: Sun May 23, 2021 10:02 pm It's not even that. It's like somebody playing Just A Minute.
8 seconds, repetition of 'even'.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 10:12 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
That's a shame.

My money was on "it really is".

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Mon May 24, 2021 7:35 pm
by kreuzberger
At eleventy-nine to one on, thems was temptin' odds.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Tue May 25, 2021 10:08 pm
by Tubby Isaacs

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Tue May 25, 2021 10:46 pm
by Bones McCoy
I really hope the family get some justice this time around.


Maybe it's worth reflecting.
If the Murdochs, the Met and the Tories are all obstructing you - you are on the side of the angels.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Wed May 26, 2021 6:56 am
by Boiler
Of those 34 years, 13 were under a Labour government. How come no progress was made in this case then?

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Wed May 26, 2021 10:10 am
by Bones McCoy
Boiler wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:56 am Of those 34 years, 13 were under a Labour government. How come no progress was made in this case then?
It's a fair question that I can't honestly answer without access to the timeline of all the enquiries.

I'm sure the popular answer revolves around a Labour government that stole Thatcher's clothes and was besties with uncle Rupert.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Wed May 26, 2021 11:00 am
by Boiler
Bones McCoy wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 10:10 am
Boiler wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 6:56 am Of those 34 years, 13 were under a Labour government. How come no progress was made in this case then?
It's a fair question that I can't honestly answer without access to the timeline of all the enquiries.

I'm sure the popular answer revolves around a Labour government that stole Thatcher's clothes and was besties with uncle Rupert.
A 'popular' answer indeed - but does it have any substance in truth? Either way, the injustice has really gone on for far too long.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Wed May 26, 2021 8:38 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
The suspects were put on trial in 2009 and the CPS (can you guess who was in charge?) didn't give up till 2011.

I don't think Labour can be blamed too much here.

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Fri May 28, 2021 1:14 pm
by Boiler

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 7:20 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
We'll get rid of asylum seekers easier after Brexit. Oh hang on.


Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 10:58 am
by Cyclist
The High Court has ruled that the Home Office's decision to house migrants in a "squalid" barracks in Folkestone was unlawful.

Six migrants claimed housing at Napier Barracks was "unsafe" and dormitory use caused a Covid-19 outbreak.

Lawyers said the accommodation in Kent breached human rights, but the Home Office said providing short-term housing there was lawful.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-57335499

Re: Priti Patel

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2021 1:05 pm
by Samanfur
More of those pesky activist judges, no doubt.